2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-70542010000300015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fixação de carbono e a emissão dos gases de efeito estufa na exploração da cana-de-açúcar

Abstract: RESUMOA produção de uma tonelada (t) de fitomassa em matéria seca (MS) de cana-de-açúcar fixa, no mínimo, 0,42 t em carbono (C), o que corresponde a mitigar 1,54 t de dióxido de carbono (CO 2 ) da atmosfera. Neste trabalho, objetivou-se efetuar um levantamento da quantidade de fitomassa da cana-de-açúcar produzida em 1 ha anualmente. Além de analisar o total de C fixado e a emissão de diversos gases de efeito estufa (GEE), em CO 2 equivalente (eqCO 2 ), em consequência da adubação nitrogenada; da queima da fit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A secondary source of GHG emissions (~32%) for production scenarios S1, S2, and S3 is the fossil fuels associated with the agricultural operations of planting, ratoon maintenance, mechanized harvest, and transport of the sugarcane to the mill. Paula et al (2010) estimated that the burning of fossil fuels (diesel) during agricultural operations in the sugarcane production process (planting, cultivation, mechanical harvesting and transportation of the product to the mill) creates a liability of 554.00 kg CO 2 eq ha À1 yr À1 , without considering the GHG emissions related to diesel extraction, processing and distribution. This result is comparable to the one estimated for the S2 scenario (600.8 kg CO 2 eq ha À1 yr À1 ), excluding GHG emissions related to diesel extraction, processing and distribution (103.1 kg CO 2 eq ha À1 yr À1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A secondary source of GHG emissions (~32%) for production scenarios S1, S2, and S3 is the fossil fuels associated with the agricultural operations of planting, ratoon maintenance, mechanized harvest, and transport of the sugarcane to the mill. Paula et al (2010) estimated that the burning of fossil fuels (diesel) during agricultural operations in the sugarcane production process (planting, cultivation, mechanical harvesting and transportation of the product to the mill) creates a liability of 554.00 kg CO 2 eq ha À1 yr À1 , without considering the GHG emissions related to diesel extraction, processing and distribution. This result is comparable to the one estimated for the S2 scenario (600.8 kg CO 2 eq ha À1 yr À1 ), excluding GHG emissions related to diesel extraction, processing and distribution (103.1 kg CO 2 eq ha À1 yr À1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO 2 emissions considering mechanized harvesting, obtained 0.2 kgCO 2 eq/L, 0.5 kgCO 2 eq/L and 0.5 kgCO 2 eq/L and 0.3 kgCO 2 eq/L, respectively (Paula et al, 2010;Cavallet et al, 2012;Turdera, 2013;Manochio et al, 2017). Indeed, no GHG emission due to the use of fossil fuels in the plants that generate the energy itself from the burning of the sugar cane bagasse Manochio et al (2017).…”
Section: Totalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total CO 2 emissions (kgCO 2 eq/L) for ethanol production (Crago et al, 2010;Paula et al, 2010;Cavallet et al, 2012;Turdera, 2013;Guerra et al, 2014;Munoz et al, 2014;Donke et al, 2017;Manochio et al, 2017).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gains are due to the carbon sequestration that occurs during sugarcane and soybean cultivation, and also due to photosynthetic action. According to Paula et al [69], the most explored cultivars in Brazil have an average CO 2 uptake rate of 449 g/kg sugarcane in natura. Regarding soybean, this rate was estimated by Rigon et al [70] as 1.36 kg/kg soybean for plants with moisture content of u = 15%.…”
Section: Carbon Balancementioning
confidence: 99%