2006
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-70542006000500007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desempenho agrônomico de soja em função da sucessão de culturas em sistema de plantio direto

Abstract: RESUMOCom o objetivo de avaliar o efeito da rotação ou sucessão de culturas sobre o desempenho agronômico de soja em semeadura direta, foi desenvolvido um experimento em Latossolo Vermelho distroférrico, no Núcleo Experimental de Ciências Agrárias da Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, em Dourados MS. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos casualizados com nove tratamentos e quatro repetições. As parcelas mediram 36 m de comprimento por 11 m de largura (396 m 2 ), onde foram semeadas mecanicamente 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the 2013/2014 season, there was smaller height of the soybean SYN 1059 plants in succession to the triticale IPR 111 culture, while the greater height occurred with the wheat BRS Tarumã crop (Table 3). These results are similar to those reported by Brandt et al (2006), who found no differences in the height of soybean plants when comparing succession systems in no-tillage, including oat and wheat. The lower height of the soybean in sucession to triticale in the 2013/2014 season can be attributed to the synergistic effects between the synchronization of the nitrogen mineralization-immobilization in the growth of soybean (Assmann et al, 2014) due to lower residual DM production provided by triticale (Table 2) (Santos et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the 2013/2014 season, there was smaller height of the soybean SYN 1059 plants in succession to the triticale IPR 111 culture, while the greater height occurred with the wheat BRS Tarumã crop (Table 3). These results are similar to those reported by Brandt et al (2006), who found no differences in the height of soybean plants when comparing succession systems in no-tillage, including oat and wheat. The lower height of the soybean in sucession to triticale in the 2013/2014 season can be attributed to the synergistic effects between the synchronization of the nitrogen mineralization-immobilization in the growth of soybean (Assmann et al, 2014) due to lower residual DM production provided by triticale (Table 2) (Santos et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Pereira (2013) found no significant effect between the predecessor cultivation of single corn and intercropping corn-brachiaria on the number of soybean pods, where single corn and intercropping provided 68 and 73 pods per soybean plant, respectively. Brandt et al (2006) evaluated the agronomic performance in soybean cultivars over predecessor crops, and found a number of 35 pods per plant. The authors claim that these values are considered normal for the good development of the crop.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluated characteristics were: a) plant height: measured using a ruler, across ten random plants in the plot in phase R5.3, according to the methods described in the study of (9,35); b) dry matter: evaluated using samples from ten plants per plot; the samples were placed in an oven with forced air circulation at 65 °C, until they reached a constant weight, according to the method of Brandt et al (2006); c) oil content: determined with 30 g (ground) of seeds from each plot using the Near Infrared Reflection (NIR) technique and expressed as a percentage (%), according to the method of Heil (2010); d) number of pods per plant: obtained by counting the number of pods per plant; e) number of grains per pod: obtained by counting the number of grains in the pods divided by the total number of pods; f) weight of one hundred seeds: determined according to the mass and total number of seeds per experimental unit; g) productivity: upon reaching physiological maturity (95% of the mature pods), the soybean plants were harvested from the two central rows of each plot, 4 m 2 , with a 0.5 m edge left unharvested. After harvesting, the plants were trailed, and the seeds were then weighed, after drying (12% humidity) and cleaning, to determine the grain yield of kg ha -1 ; (h) days for flowering: the days from emergence necessary to have an open flower in 50% of the plants of the plot; this characteristic was evaluated using ten plants chosen at random, according to the method employed by Carvalho (2014); and i) days for maturation: determined from the number of days from emergence necessary to have 95% of mature pods; this characteristic was evaluated using ten random plants in the plot, according to that method.…”
Section: Evaluated Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%