2003
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-70542003000200029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efeito da idade de corte na performance de três forrageiras do gênero Cynodon

Abstract: Tifton 85 (Cynodon spp). The treatments were done in a completely randomised blocks design in a split plot scheme with five replications. The grass cultivars (= treatments) were placed in the plots and the harvesting ages were in the subplots. Regardlessly the studied cultivars, the dry matter production, with the advance of the maturity stage, increased in a quadratic way (2,15 to 11,09 Mg/ha), reaching the maximum production at 70 days. The total protein contents 1. Parte da tese apresentada à UNIVERSIDADE F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in the response of each cultivar are due to the ability of plants to produce new tillers after cutting (Bortolini et al, 2004). Cedeño et al (2003) in the south of Minas Gerais working with three forage species (Tifton 68, Tifton 85 and Coast cross), highlight the influence of the cut in forage production. For local conditions the Cedeño et al (2003) found out that the best cutting age occurs between 35 and 48 days for grasses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences in the response of each cultivar are due to the ability of plants to produce new tillers after cutting (Bortolini et al, 2004). Cedeño et al (2003) in the south of Minas Gerais working with three forage species (Tifton 68, Tifton 85 and Coast cross), highlight the influence of the cut in forage production. For local conditions the Cedeño et al (2003) found out that the best cutting age occurs between 35 and 48 days for grasses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cedeño et al (2003) in the south of Minas Gerais working with three forage species (Tifton 68, Tifton 85 and Coast cross), highlight the influence of the cut in forage production. For local conditions the Cedeño et al (2003) found out that the best cutting age occurs between 35 and 48 days for grasses. Fão et al (2006) evaluated oat cultivars in Cruz Alta (RS), with the application of 200 kg ha -1 of the formula 5-20-20 at planting and 20 kg of N at tillering with cut at 74 days after emergency emergence for the cultivar common black oat, and at 87 days for IAPAR 61, IPR 126, FAPA 2 and FUNDACEP FAPA 43, respectively, 1.024, 1.271, 1.265, 1.671 and 1.649 kg ha -1 of dry matter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The in vitro dry matter digestibility levels were similar in the cuts performed on 09/07/14 with a 64day interval and in the cut performed on 02/19/14 with an interval of 35 days, and higher than the cut done on 10/08/14 with an interval of 93 days. In evaluating the IVDMD levels of Coastcross, Tifton 68 and Tifton 85, Cedeno, Rocha, Pinto, Muniz and Gomide (2003) found IVDMD values of 60.69%, 65.77% and 60.53%, respectively, at the 42-day cut interval, and values of 47%, 30%, 55.49%, 57.41% at 70 days of cut interval, respectively, for the same forages, demonstrating that the evaluated populations showed good quality with digestibility levels above 55% (Leng, 1990). The lower IVDMD content at the 93-day cut interval is due to changes in the chemical composition of forages with advancing physiological age of the plants (Carvalho & Pires, 2008).…”
Section: Variation Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summer, spring, and fall, the more favorable climatic conditions for forage production resulted in higher leaf production, with a higher CP and lower fiber contents. The digestibility of tropical grasses gradually decreases during winter due to increased structural carbohydrates and lignin contents, resulting in lower forage digestibility (Cedeño et al 2003).…”
Section: Chemical Composition Of Foragementioning
confidence: 99%