Family socioeconomic status and the provision of motor affordances in the home

Freitas, Teresa C. B.; Gabbard, Carl; Caçola, Priscila; Montebelo, Maria Imaculada Lima; Santos, Denise Castilho Cabrera

doi:10.1590/s1413-35552013005000096

Cited by 79 publications

(88 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In other studies 12,[18][19][20][21][22][23] , there was negative evidence regarding opportunities for motor stimulation in the home environment. The home environment is considered crucial to the development of the child 23,24 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Opportunities for motor stimulation in the home environment of children

Silva

Lisboa²,

Ferrari

et al. 2017

J. Hum. Growth Dev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The environment in which the child is inserted and motor opportunities offered to this is essential for a good motor development Objective: To analyze the relationship between the motor stimulation opportunities in the family environment and children's motor development of both sex. Method: were evaluated 72 children, 33 boys and 39 girls with age of 38 to 42 months. The evaluation was conducted by Affordances in the Home Environment for Motor Development (AHEMD) and the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 (TGMD-2). Were used the tests Chi-square, Fisher exact test, t test for independent samples, Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression. Results: In general, the households have low opportunities for motor stimulation, and for households with boys the score is higher. The girls performed better in locomotor skills, while boys had higher scores on object control skills. It found a significant correlation to motricity materials and thick materials motor for boys and variety of stimulation, fine motor materials, motricity materials and motor stimulation for girls. For the boys the motor performance is explained by the available variables of fine and gross motor skills and for the girls by materials of motor stimulation, stimulation variety and materials of fine and gross motor skills. Conclusion: On the presented results we can conclude that the home environment is directly related to the motor development of girls and boys.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Opportunities for motor stimulation in the home environment of children

Silva

Lisboa²,

Ferrari

et al. 2017

J. Hum. Growth Dev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As for the environmental quality and child development, Brazilian studies bring important contributions to the international publications scenario, especially in the motor development domain 9,12,[18][19][31][32][33][35][36][37][38][39]41 . According to Zaslow et al 53 , when conducting an international literature review, there are more studies on some areas of child development at the expense of others, such as the influence of the daycare environment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some studies have assessed what socioeconomic risk factors were related to the family environment, unfavorable to the child development 7,11,[18][19][20][21][22] . Home environments were qualified according to HOME or AHEDMD.…”

Section: Child Development Within the Home Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Home environments were qualified according to HOME or AHEDMD. The studies found that the low quality of the home environment was associated with: low monthly income 11,[18][19]20 , the lower strata in the economic classification [18][19] , the mother's low education 7,11,[18][19]20 , the father's low education [18][19] , the large number of people living in the house 11,18,20 , younger children 7,18 the presence of many siblings 7,11,20 , tobacco use during pregnancy 20 , children sleeping with parents up to four years of age 20 , mothers with psychiatric disorders 20 , mothers who did not work out 7 and female single parents 7,18 .…”

Section: Child Development Within the Home Contextmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

O contexto ambiental e o desenvolvimento na primeira infância: estudos brasileiros

Morais¹,

Carvalho²,

Magalhães³

2016

J Physical Edu

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMOO objetivo deste estudo foi realizar revisão integrativa dos estudos brasileiros sobre a influência dos fatores ambientais no desenvolvimento global, motor e cognitivo. Procedeu-se à busca de artigos científicos nas bases SciELO e MEDLINE de 2004 a 2014, utilizando os descritores "desenvolvimento infantil", "child development" "environment" e "Brazil". Foram selecionados 38 estudos, segundo os critérios de inclusão e exclusão pré-estabelecidos. Os estudos foram desenvolvidos em diferentes regiões do Brasil e fazendo uso desde testes de triagem a diagnósticos. A maioria dos estudos estava relacionada a fatores de risco ou prevalência de atrasos. Aqueles que focaram na influência da qualidade ambiental no desenvolvimento infantil, ora analisaram o ambiente familiar, ora a creche. Conclui-se que há importante literatura para o embasamento de estudos de intervenção, ainda escassos. Além disto, há necessidade de estudos brasileiros que analisem a inter-relação dinâmica entre os ambientes vivenciados pela criança e sua influência no desenvolvimento infantil. Palavras-chave: Desenvolvimento infantil. Ambiente sociocultural. Brasil. ABSTRACTThe objective of this study was to make an integrative review of the brazilian studies regarding the influence of environmental factors on global, cognitive and motor development. We searched for scientific articles in SciELO and MEDLINE from 2004 to 2014 using the key words "child development" "environment" and "Brazil." According to the established criteria for inclusion and exclusion, 38 studies were selected. The studies were conducted in different regions of Brazil using techniques that varied from screening to diagnostic tests. Most studies were related to risk factors or prevalence of delays. Those studies that focused on the influence of environmental quality on child development, either analyzed the family or the day care centers. We concluded that important literature for the foundation of intervention studies. Furthermore, there is a need for studies that analyze the dynamic interrelation between the environments experienced by the child and their influence on development.

show abstract

“…Keluarga dengan pendapatan cukup memungkinkan orangtua memberikan alat permainan sebagai sarana stimulasi perkembangan anak. Keluarga tersebut juga cenderung memberikan lingkungan yang secara tidak langsung menyebabkan anak tersebut berinteraksi sehingga stimulasi perkembangan terjadi baik fisik maupun verbal (Freitas, 2013;Martini, 2012;Hastuti, 2009). …”

Section: Pengaruh Panjang Badan Lahir Danunclassified

Biopsychosocial Factors, Life Course Perspective, and Their Influences on Language Development in Children

Safriana

Salimo²,

Dewi

2017

J MATERN CHILD HEALTH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Speech and language disorder if untreated may cause deficiency in reading, verbal, psychosocial, behavioral, and academic abilities. Studies have shown that birthweight, body length at birth, maternal education, parenting style, maternal stress, income at pregnancy, and current income can influence child development. This study aimed to determine the biopsychosocial factors, life course perspective, and their influences on language development in children. Subject and Method:This was an analytic observational study using case control design. The study was conducted in Surakarta, Central Java, from February to May 2017. A sample of 140 children aged 2 to 5 years old were selected for this study by fixed disease sampling with 1:3 ratio between case (children with speech and language disorder) and control (children without such disorder). The dependent variable was child speech and language development. The independent variables were birthweight, body length at birth, maternal education, maternal stress, parenting style, family income at pregnancy, and current family income. The data were collected by a set of questionnaire and medical record. The data on speech and language ability was measured by Denver II questionnaire. Path analysis was employed for data analysis. Results: Language development was directly and positively affected by democratic parenting style (b=0.46; SE=0.08; p<0.001), permissive parenting style (b=0.10; SE=0.11; p=0.020), birthweight (b=0.12; SE=0.02; p=0.002), maternal education (b=0.11; SE=0.31; p=0.007), maternal stress (b=-0.13; SE=0.04; p=0.013). Language development directly and negatively affected by autoritarian parenting style (b=-0.37; SE=0.09; p<0.001). Language development was indirectly affected by body length at birth, family income at pregnancy, and current family income. Conclusion: Language development is directly affected by parenting style, birthweight, maternal education, maternal stress.

show abstract

Family socioeconomic status and the provision of motor affordances in the home

Cited by 79 publications

References 31 publications

Opportunities for motor stimulation in the home environment of children

Opportunities for motor stimulation in the home environment of children

O contexto ambiental e o desenvolvimento na primeira infância: estudos brasileiros

Biopsychosocial Factors, Life Course Perspective, and Their Influences on Language Development in Children

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About