2012
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-35552012000600006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comportamento da força muscular respiratória de obesas mórbidas por diferentes equações preditivas

Abstract: Background: Studies on the behavior of respiratory muscle strength (RMS) in morbidly obese patients have found conflicting results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They showed that, for women, age and body mass had a negative influence on measures of maximum respiratory pressures; however, it is worth noting that the BMI of the studied population was Ͻ30 kg/m 2 . Pazzianotto-Forti et al 14 evaluated the behavior of respiratory muscle strength in morbidly obese individuals using 3 different predictive equations and found 3 different results (predicted values) for the same value obtained. This suggests that the existing equations in the literature are not able to provide a reliable prediction of respiratory muscle strength for the morbidly obese and justifies the inconclusive results found in the literature on respiratory muscle strength in this population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that, for women, age and body mass had a negative influence on measures of maximum respiratory pressures; however, it is worth noting that the BMI of the studied population was Ͻ30 kg/m 2 . Pazzianotto-Forti et al 14 evaluated the behavior of respiratory muscle strength in morbidly obese individuals using 3 different predictive equations and found 3 different results (predicted values) for the same value obtained. This suggests that the existing equations in the literature are not able to provide a reliable prediction of respiratory muscle strength for the morbidly obese and justifies the inconclusive results found in the literature on respiratory muscle strength in this population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embora a influência da obesidade sobre as PRM seja controversa, argumentase que a restrição da cavidade torácica causada pela deposição excessiva de gordura na região toracoabdominal altera a mobilidade dos músculos abdominais e diafragmáticos, causando aumento do trabalho respiratório e consequente desvantagem muscular, o que justificar a diminuição das PRM [20,21]. Entretanto, apesar dessa linha de raciocínio, as equações preditivas mais utilizadas na literatura brasileira não incluem variáveis antropométricas como peso ou IMC e, portanto, não contemplam de forma confiável a avaliação para populações não eutróficas [13]. Uma revisão sistemática publicada em 2014 sobre a avaliação da PImáx já discutiu a [23].…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Entretanto, a análise da força muscular respiratória através da pressão inspiratória máxima (PImáx) e da pressão expiratória máxima (PEmáx) em obesos tem provocado discussões conflitantes, sem um consenso sobre seu comportamento nesse grupo [9,13], principalmente quando estudados os valores previstos pelas equações de referência. Nesse contexto, o objetivo do presente estudo foi analisar o poder preditivo das equações de referência de PMR para obesos antes e após a perda de peso por cirurgia bariátrica.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The behavior of respiratory muscle strength in these patients is still poorly understood. It is important to assess the inspiratory and expiratory muscle strength in the preoperative and postoperative periods of bariatric surgery, since respiratory muscle dysfunction is one of the causes of pulmonary complications 11,12 . The objective of this study is to evaluate and to compare respiratory muscle strength in morbidly obese individuals undergoing bariatric surgery by the conventional and by the laparoscopic routes during hospitalization for obesity surgical treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%