Motor development evaluated by Test of Infant Motor Performance: comparison between preterm and full-term infants

Guimarães, Carmen L. N.; Reinaux, Cyda; Botelho, Ana Carla Gomes; Lima, Geisy Maria Souza; Filho, José Eulálio Cabral

doi:10.1590/s1413-35552011005000021

Cited by 14 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Relative to income, there was no relationship with ND, which contradicts other studies that negatively associated low income with the children's ND [15][16][17] .…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 94%

“…Although studies have demonstrated the existence of a link between prematurity and delayed development of the child 14,15 . From the data on GA, it was observed that most children were born at term (81.82%), the data associated with the high number of mothers who received PN (98.99%), shows that the absence of prenatal care may be linked to prematurity 16,17 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Association between breastfeeding, obstetric factors and child development in Northeast Brazil

Severiano

Dantas

Oliveira

et al. 2017

J. Hum. Growth Dev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To analyse the influence of exclusive breastfeeding and associated factors on the neurodevelopment (ND) of children up to 36 months old. Methods: A cross-sectional, community-based study with individuated data of 99 children up to 36 months old, evaluated socio demographic, obstetric and neonatal variables and assessed ND through the Development Monitoring Instrument. The variables were analysed using descriptive statistics and regression testing. Data were considered significant when p <0.05.Results: : Regarding ND, 70.71% of the children had achieved the motor milestones for their age, 98.99% of mothers breastfed, 37.38% of them had exclusive breastfed (EBF) for six months. Factors that positively influenced the ND were vaginal delivery when compared to children with other types of delivery, and EBF for 6 months when compared to children who had EBF less than six months. Conclusion: The practice of exclusive breastfeeding for less than six months is associated with a higher prevalence of lower psychomotor development of children from zero to 36 months old. Other factors associated with delay in development are instrumented vaginal delivery with forceps or caesarean delivery. Open acess Keywords 159J Hum Growth Dev. 2017; 27(2): 158-165 Association between breastfeeding, obstetric factors and child development in northeast Brazil

show abstract

“…Relative to income, there was no relationship with ND, which contradicts other studies that negatively associated low income with the children's ND [15][16][17] .…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 94%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Association between breastfeeding, obstetric factors and child development in Northeast Brazil

Severiano

Dantas

Oliveira

et al. 2017

J. Hum. Growth Dev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Prematurity significantly influences the motor development of infants and may contribute to an onset of delays 6 . Newborn preterm infants (PI) have a higher mortality rate and also have a higher risk of developing disorders and other sequelae that affect them both in the neonatal stage, as well as later in their development in general 7 , which is corroborated by various studies that correlate prematurity and delayed motor development 8,9,10,11 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 86%

Comparison of the motor development in preterm infants from two brazilian regional samples

Formiga

Nonato

Amaral

et al. 2013

J. Hum. Growth Dev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The present study aimed to compare motor development of infants preterm samples from two regional Brazilian, using a reliable scale evaluation, to determine the influence that environmental context can have on infants exposed to perinatal conditions and similar risk factors. Methods: Two samples were used transverse infants with low birth weight: study group (SG = 70) and comparison group (CG = 43). The evaluation instrument used was the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Results: There were no statistically significant differences in total score on the AIMS, although they were no differences in the variables gestational age (at 2, 3 and 4 months) and birth weight (weight slightly larger than the GC) among infants. There was also a difference in the classification of motor development at 2 and 3 months of corrected age, according to the standard scale, in which GE was ranked as the latest GC. Conclusion: The results suggest that different regions of preterm infants exhibit the same trend in its motor, even if subjected to different environmental influences. It is suggested the extension of this study considering the more detailed control of the environment in which the infant is inserted, including maternal practices.

show abstract

“…According to Guimaraes et al, many factors in the environment of the neonatal intensive care unit that may have a bad effect on preterm infant development as high noise, lack of day/night cycles and too much handling [10]. The intra-uterine environment has tactile, kinetic, rhythmic and temporarily organized stimuli (e.g.…”

Section: Comparison Between Mean Value Of Preterm and Full Term Infanmentioning

confidence: 99%

Motor Development Evaluation of Low Risk Preterm Infants through the First Six Months of Life

Abouelkheir¹,

Khalil²

2019

JPNB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Preterm and low birth weight children are at risk for developmental deficits, many preterm children even who do not develop cerebral palsy not having reached normal motor development level regarding their chronological age. Normal motor development starts at conception and continue throughout life according to a typical sequence, pattern and timing. Evaluation and early detection of developmental deviation in preterm infants will improve the concept of early intervention and result in better quality of life to the preterm infants and their families. A longitudinal, quantitative, comparative studyone hundred infants: Preterm and full-term infants were evaluated by Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) through the first 6 months of life. There was significant difference in mean values AIMS of preterm and full term newborns. Further studies are needed to assess motor development in preterm using corrected age.

show abstract

Motor development evaluated by Test of Infant Motor Performance: comparison between preterm and full-term infants

Cited by 14 publications

References 31 publications

Association between breastfeeding, obstetric factors and child development in Northeast Brazil

Association between breastfeeding, obstetric factors and child development in Northeast Brazil

Comparison of the motor development in preterm infants from two brazilian regional samples

Motor Development Evaluation of Low Risk Preterm Infants through the First Six Months of Life

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About