2007
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-35552007000300010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliação da pressão inspiratória máxima em pacientes críticos não-cooperativos: comparação entre dois métodos

Abstract: Background: Although mechanical ventilation is necessary for treating acute respiratory insufficiency, it may be associated with deconditioning and respiratory muscle dysfunction. Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) evaluation is used to estimate inspiratory muscle strength in artificially ventilated patients, but there is no definition as to the best way to make this measurement. Objective: To compare two methods for MIP evaluation, using four different protocols, among non-cooperative artificially ventilated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements of respiratory pressures lasted from 40 to 60 seconds, having as subjective basis the patients' comfort (adapted from Guimarães et al 22 ) and were only repeated if deemed necessary. On MEP, a manovacuometer (Comercial Médica -SP/Brazil, ±120 cmH 2 O) with oneway valve that allowed only the inspiration necessary for the Valsalva maneuver was attached to the AAW: maximal expiratory effort in total lung capacity (TLC) with occlusive AAW.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements of respiratory pressures lasted from 40 to 60 seconds, having as subjective basis the patients' comfort (adapted from Guimarães et al 22 ) and were only repeated if deemed necessary. On MEP, a manovacuometer (Comercial Médica -SP/Brazil, ±120 cmH 2 O) with oneway valve that allowed only the inspiration necessary for the Valsalva maneuver was attached to the AAW: maximal expiratory effort in total lung capacity (TLC) with occlusive AAW.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurement was performed by one single investigator, with the manometer calibrated before each measurement keeping the pointer on zero, and next connected to the adapter and this to the unidirectional valve inspiratory branch. (14) The randomization was made by simple lottery, according to which was decided the initial airway occlusion time used for the subjects entering the trial. This random order of the initial times had a 15 minutes interval.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent trial investigated the IPmax evaluation in thirty non-cooperative and under MV weaning patients using two occlusion times, 20 and 40 seconds, showing significant differences for the IP40 versus IP20 comparison (56.6 ± 23.3 versus 43.4 ± 24 cmH2O; p<0.001), agreeing with this trial results, reporting as the best IPmax evaluation for non-cooperative patients a 40 seconds occlusion. (14) Another trial evaluated two occlusion methods in a heterogeneous 28 subjects population, either with or without consciousness level changes, under ventilatory weaning process, concluding that IP20 looks to be insufficient to measure the real IPmax in GCSS < 15 patients. (3) However, the measurement should have been performed in a more homogeneous patients population, such as in traumatic and non-traumatic, clinical and surgical neurological patients.…”
Section: Airway Occlusion Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A mensuração da força muscular respiratória permite identificar precocemente quadros de fraqueza muscular respiratória e de insuficiência respiratória (1) , proporciona maior segurança no tratamento de pacientes (2) , indica a gravidade, as consequências funcionais e o progresso de diversas disfunções pulmonares e neuromusculares (3) , além de contribuir para um melhor acompanhamento do processo de desmame da ventilação mecânica (4) . Existem diversos procedimentos invasivos ou não para avaliar a força muscular respiratória.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified