Anelídeos poliquetos associados a um briozoário: II. Palmyridae

Morgado, E H; Amaral, A. Cecíl ia Z.

doi:10.1590/s0373-55241981000100011

Cited by 7 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Citação bibliográfica e/ou Coleção Científica Localidadetipo Araçá Abra lioica (Dall, 1881) Migotto et al 1993;Belúcio, 1992Belúcio, , 1995Belúcio & Morgado, 1994Arruda & Amaral, 2003;Arruda et al 2003;Denadai et al 2005 Anadara notabilis (Röding, 1798) Ditadi, 1982b -Anomalocardia brasiliana (Gmelin, 1791) Leonel, 1981;Ditadi, 1982b;Montouchet, 1988;Belúcio & Morgado, 1991Migotto et al 1993;Belúcio, 1992Belúcio, , 1995Dworschak & Rodrigues, 1997;Arruda & Amaral, 1998 Montouchet, 1988;Belúcio & Morgado, 1991Duarte, 1980b;Belúcio, 1992Belúcio, , 1995 Lopes, 1993;Amaral et al 1994Amaral et al , 2003Reis et al 1996;Omena& Amaral, 1997;Reis & Amaral, 1998;Padovanni, 2009 Sawaya, & Freitas, 1972;Ditadi, 1982b;Zinner & Vani, 1986;Vani, 1987;Dworschak & Rodrigues, 1997;Anker et al 2005 (como Chaetopterus variopedatus) Chrysopetalum occidentale Johnson, 1897 Morgado, 1980b;Morgado & Amaral, 1981b;Morgado & Tanaka, 2001 (como Chaetopterus variopedatus) Cirriformia filigera (Delle Chiaje, 1825) Duarte, 1980b;…”

Section: Táxon Superior Espécieunclassified

“…nov.) Nogueira et al 2004a;Rossi, 2008-Labrorostratus prolificus Amaral, 1977Steiner, 2000-Laeonereis culveri (Webster, 1879 Amaral & Morgado, 1987Amaral et al , 1994Amaral et al , 2003Lopes, 1993;Amaral & Morgado, 1994;Omena & Amaral, 1997;Reis & Amaral, 1997Steiner & Amaral, 1998;Steiner, 2000 Morgado & Amaral, 1981c;Morgado, 1980b;Morgado & Tanaka, 2001 Loimia medusa (Savigny, 1818) Lopes, 1993;Morgado & Tanaka, 2001-Loimia sp. Ditadi, 1982b-Lumbrineris albifrons Crossland, 1924Duarte, 1980bMorgado, 1980b;Morgado & Amaral, 1981a;Duarte & Nalesso, 1996;Morgado & Tanaka, 2001 Lumbrineris tetraura (Schmarda, 1861) Lopes, 1993;Amaral & Morgado, 1994;Steiner, 2000-Lysibranchia sp. Lopes, 1993-Lysidice ninetta A.…”

Section: Táxon Superior Espéciementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Lopes, 1993-Lysidice ninetta A. & M.Edwards, 1833Morgado & Amaral, 1981aLopes, 1993;Duarte & Nalesso, 1996;Steiner & Amaral, 1998;Morgado & Tanaka, 2001 Magelona nonatoi Bolivar & Lana, 1986Lopes, 1993-Magelona papillicornis F. Müller, 1858Lopes, 1993Amaral & Morgado, 1994-Magelona posterelongata Bolivar & Lana, 1986Lopes, 1993-Magelona riojai Jones, 1963Lopes, 1993-Magelona variolamellata Bolivar & Lana, 1986 Lopes, 1993 -Magelona sp. Lopes, 1993;Omena & Amaral, 1997-Marphysa angelensis Fauchald, 1970Duarte, 1980bMorgado & Amaral, 1981a;Duarte & Nalesso, 1996 Petersen & Fanta, 1969 Ditadi, 1982b -Mesochaetopterus xerecus Petersen & Fanta, 1969 Ditadi, 1982b -Naineris setosa (Verrill, 1900) Ditadi, 1970a;Ditadi, 1982b;Lopes, 1993;Amaral et al 2003 Duarte, 1980b;Morgado, 1980b;Morgado & Amaral, 1984a,b;Lopes, 1993;Duarte & Nalesso, 1996;Morgado & Tanaka, 2001 - …”

Section: Táxon Superior Espéciementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Citação bibliográfica e/ou Coleção Científica Localidadetipo Araçá Salvatoria nitidula (Verrill, 1900) Fukuda (em andamento) -Scalisetosus gracilis Morgado & Amaral, 1981Morgado & Amaral, 1981bDuarte & Nalesso, 1996;Morgado & Tanaka, 2001 Scalisetosus pellucidus (Ehlers, 1864) Duarte, 1980b;Morgado, 1980b-Scolelepis chilensis (Hartmann-Schröder, 1962) Lopes, 1993;Amaral & Morgado, 1994;Amaral et al 1994 - Pillai, 1961Lopes, 1993 johnstonei (Day, 1934) Lopes, 1993 -Scoloplos (Leodamas) ohlini (Ehlers, 1901) Lopes, 1993 -Scoloplos (Leodamas) sp.n. Amaral & Morgado, 1987Lopes, 1993;Amaral et al 1994Amaral et al , 2003Reis et al 1996 Duarte, 1980b;Morgado, 1980b;Morgado & Amaral, 1985;Duarte & Nalesso, 1996;Morgado & Tanaka, 2001 Trypanosyllis zebra (Grube, 1840) Nogueira & Fukuda, 2007;Nogueira & Fukuda, 2008 Typosyllis hyalina (Grube, 1863) Duarte, 1980b;Morgado, 1980b-Typosyllis maculata Imajima, 1966Duarte, 1980bMorgado & Amaral, 1985;Duarte & Nalesso, 1996;Morgado & Tanaka, 2001 Typosyllis variegata (Grube, 1860 Morgado & Amaral, 1985;Duarte & Nalesso, 1996 …”

Section: Táxon Superior Espécieunclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Araçá: biodiversidade, impactos e ameaças

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Araçá: biodiversity, impacts and threats. Biota Neotrop.,10(1): http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v10n1/en/abstract?inventory+bn01210012010.Abstract:Araçá Bay (São Sebastião, State of São Paulo), within one of Brazil's most beautiful coastlines, has small relict mangrove stands and a very diverse marine ecosystem. As such, the bay is a natural laboratory as well as important for local small scale fishing. In this study we summarize the large literature base to comprehensibly list the flora and fauna as a preliminary biodiversity inventory of Araçá Bay. We place this in the historical context of human impact on the environment of the bay and we emphasize new, introduced and threatened species as bioindicators and natural resources. With this information, we provide a basis to inform conservation decisions as well as data for conservation management plans and call attention to the urgent need to protect this fragile environment and biota. We also emphasize that this small and uniquely biologically rich bay should be preserved, revitalized and integrated into the growing urban environment. Resumo: Inserida em uma das mais belas e turísticas regiões litorâneas do país -o Litoral Norte do Estado deSão Paulo -, a Baía do Araçá (São Sebastião, SP), além de conter remanescentes de manguezal e de abrigar alta diversidade biológica, é também um verdadeiro laboratório a céu aberto e um importante reduto de catadores de moluscos e pescadores artesanais. Com o objetivo de compilar preliminarmente a biodiversidade da baía, este estudo reúne a extensa bibliografia dedicada à região e apresenta a lista das espécies da fauna e da flora formalmente reportadas para o local. O texto sumaria ainda o histórico das alterações antrópicas sofridas nas últimas décadas e destaca certos representantes da fauna (espécies novas, ameaçadas de extinção, bioindicadoras e como recursos naturais), como exemplos da peculiaridade e riqueza biológica dessa pequena baía. Pretende-se, assim, fornecer subsídios para tomadas de decisão e planos de manejo, e despertar a atenção para a preservação desse frágil patrimônio ambiental, uma área que pode ser revitalizada e integrada ao ambiente urbanizado.

show abstract

Section: Táxon Superior Espécieunclassified

Section: Táxon Superior Espéciementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Táxon Superior Espéciementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Táxon Superior Espécieunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Araçá: biodiversidade, impactos e ameaças

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…ln order to define the differences between our specimens and Eunice rubra, which has been reported several times from the Brazilian coast (NONATO & Lu NA 1970;MORGADO & AMARAL 1981 ;DUARTE & NALESSO 1996), three specimens of the latter from the collection of Dr. Edmundo FelTaz Nonato were bOlTowed, and the holotype was also examined. The analysis indicated that the seven specimens from Brazil were actually E. rubra.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Eunice rubra Grube (Annelida, Polychaeta, Eunicidae), a redescription based on the holotype and Brazilian specimens

2002

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. Based on features of the holotype and seven Brazilian specimens examined under stereomicroscope,light microscope, and scanning electron microscope, Eunice rubra Grube, 1856 is redescribed, allowing for intraspecific variation and providing information on characters not included in a previous redescription. Characters important for the taxonomy of the genus varied widely, a1though in some cases because of fixation artefacts. KEY WORDS. Eunice rubra, Eunicidae, Polychaeta, taxonomy, south-eastern Brazil FAUCHALD (1992) based his revision of Eunice Cuvier, 1817 upon type material , some of which consisted of poorly preserved specimens, few or single individuaIs , or individuaIs with missing parts. Because of this, in severa! species certain characters were scored as unknown, and intraspecific variation was impossible or nearly impossible to evaluate. Eunice rubra Grube, 1856 is a good example. FAUCHALD (1992) examined only the holotype, which was incomplete, and therefore characters such as maxillary formulae, totallength, and the morphology of the posterior end were impossible to describe precisely.ln Brazil, four specimens of a species which was previously considered as new and close to E. rubra, were collected in a sandy beach and in living colonies of the coral Mussismilia hispida (Verrill, 1868). ln order to define the differences between our specimens and Eunice rubra, which has been reported several times from the Brazilian coast (NONATO & Lu NA 1970;MORGADO & AMARAL 1981 ;DUARTE & NALESSO 1996), three specimens of the latter from the collection of Dr. Edmundo FelTaz Nonato were bOlTowed, and the holotype was also examined. The analysis indicated that the seven specimens from Brazil were actually E. rubra. Moreover, this species shows variation in characters considered important by FAUCHALD (1992) for the taxonomy of the genus, such as the shape of articu lations in palps, antennae and peristomial cirri, the segment on which the branchiae first appear, and the number of branchial filaments per parapodium. ln the present paper, E. rubra is redescribed, based on a comprehensive morphological comparison of the holotype and the seven Brazilian specimens. The

show abstract