1980
DOI: 10.1590/s0373-55241980000200008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecologia trófica de la caballa (Scombridae, Scomber japonicus marplatensis) del Atlantico sudoccidental

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of current knowledge regarding the feeding habits of pelagic fish in the north Patagonian region of the ACS, such as E. anchoita and S. colias , a partial overlap of their diets with T. lathami could be inferred. This fact, which was already mentioned by Angelescu (1980), deserves attention since both species sustain fisheries of commercial interest (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca Argentina, 2020) and might suffer changes in population biomass when facing food constraints. Crustacean zooplankton, particularly copepods (>90% of relative importance in the diet), are the main prey item of E. anchoita (Angelescu, 1980; Pájaro, 2002) and S. colias (Padovani & Leonarduzzi, 2017; Padovani & Pájaro, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the basis of current knowledge regarding the feeding habits of pelagic fish in the north Patagonian region of the ACS, such as E. anchoita and S. colias , a partial overlap of their diets with T. lathami could be inferred. This fact, which was already mentioned by Angelescu (1980), deserves attention since both species sustain fisheries of commercial interest (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca Argentina, 2020) and might suffer changes in population biomass when facing food constraints. Crustacean zooplankton, particularly copepods (>90% of relative importance in the diet), are the main prey item of E. anchoita (Angelescu, 1980; Pájaro, 2002) and S. colias (Padovani & Leonarduzzi, 2017; Padovani & Pájaro, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This fact, which was already mentioned by Angelescu (1980), deserves attention since both species sustain fisheries of commercial interest (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca Argentina, 2020) and might suffer changes in population biomass when facing food constraints. Crustacean zooplankton, particularly copepods (>90% of relative importance in the diet), are the main prey item of E. anchoita (Angelescu, 1980; Pájaro, 2002) and S. colias (Padovani & Leonarduzzi, 2017; Padovani & Pájaro, 2014). Hence, a dietary overlap between the three species might occur for this prey item, but may not necessarily mean competition if food availability is sufficient (Bachiller & Irigoien, 2015; Holbrook & Schmitt, 1989; Irigoien & De Roos, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A mesma figura apresenta algumas rotas que partem do "capim aquato". Embora haja a possibilidade de que algumas conexões possam implicar em interaç&o energética direta, interações indiretas também podem ocorrer, uma vez que os pescadores distinguem o ato de "comer ~ capim" do ato de "comer ~ capim", o primeiro dos quais representa herbi:ltoria e o segundo utilização de "habitat trófico" (Angelescu, 1980), pois "tem peixe que o que ele come é aquele lodinho que dá no capim".…”
Section: )unclassified
“…DATA A NA LY S I S Feeding incidence (I F ) was calculated as the percentage of individuals with at least one prey item in their stomach (Arthur, 1976). A stomach fullness index (%I SF ) was calculated following Angelescu (1979) as…”
Section: S T U Dy a R E A A N D S A M P L I N Gmentioning
confidence: 99%