2014
DOI: 10.1590/s0370-44672014000200002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DRASTIC and GOD vulnerability maps of the Cabril River Basin, Portugal

Abstract: The main purpose of this study is to compare two methodologies, DRASTIC and GOD, applied to the basin of the Cabril River in determining groundwater vulnerability to pollution. The justification for the research work in this area relates to the fact that we are facing a basin adjoining the town of Vila Real (Portugal), with a propensity to expand into this area, and where there are many springs, both near the base of the basin and in hillside areas. As a result of the application, the GOD and DRASTIC maps were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5). The GOD methodology is used in several studies, with satisfactory results, mainly due to the ease of obtaining and interacting the three parameters involved (Mendonza and Barmen, 2006;Debernardi et al, 2008;Martinez-Bastida et al, 2010;Fernandes et al, 2014). In this study, such punctual vulnerability indices were obtained from well data and inverse geoelectrical models.…”
Section: Identification Of the Water Level Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). The GOD methodology is used in several studies, with satisfactory results, mainly due to the ease of obtaining and interacting the three parameters involved (Mendonza and Barmen, 2006;Debernardi et al, 2008;Martinez-Bastida et al, 2010;Fernandes et al, 2014). In this study, such punctual vulnerability indices were obtained from well data and inverse geoelectrical models.…”
Section: Identification Of the Water Level Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metode ini memilki kesederhanaan dalam hal konsep dan apikasinya, dan telah diuji coba secara meluas untuk pengukuran kerentanan akuifer terhadap pencemaran di Amerika Latin dan Karibia selama tahun 1990-an (Foster et al, 2007). Metode ini telah digunakan dalam sejumlah penelitian oleh para peneliti terdahulu di berbagai negara untuk mengidentifikasi tingkat kerentanan akuifer (Fernandes et al, 2014;Gad et al, 2015;Hastuti dkk., 2016;Falowo et al, 2017;Knouz et al, 2017;Olojoku et al, 2017).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Olojoku et al (2017) mengidentifikasi tingkat kerentanan akuifer bebas pada daerah pedesaan di Northcentral Nigeria, dimana tingkat kerentanan akuifer di daerah tersebut berkisar 0,49 -0,56 dengan mayoritas (95%) tingkat kerentanan akuifernya tinggi. Tingkat kerentanan akuifer yang tinggi pada umumnya pada daerah-daerah dengan jenis akuifer bebas atau memiliki muka air tanah yang dangkal (Fernandes et al, 2014;Falowo et al, 2017;Knouz et al, 2017). Secara umum dapat dinyatakan bahwa sumber daya air tanah yang berada pada akuifer terkekang maupun akuifer semi terkekang lebih aman terhadap potensi bahaya pencemaran.…”
Section: Tabel 2 Tingkat Kerentanan Akuifer DI Lokasi Kajianunclassified