2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-66322009000200015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FBC desulfurization process using coal with low sulfur content, high oxidizing conditions and metamorphic limestones

Abstract: -A metamorphic limestone and a dolomite were employed as SO 2 sorbents in the desulfurization of gas from coal combustion. The tests were performed in a fluidized bed reactor on a bench and pilot scale. Several parameters such as bed temperature, sorbent type, and sorbent particle size at different Ca/S molar ratios were analyzed. These parameters were evaluated for the combustion of coal with low-sulfur/high-ash content, experimental conditions of high air excess and high O 2 level in fluidization air. Under … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase of SO 2 concentration always enhances the sulfation rate of the CaO, as shown in the research of Abanades et al [23] and Diego et al [11]. Smaller sorbent particle size is favorable for the reaction of CaO and SO 2 because of the larger specific surface area smaller particles has [10,24]. However, sorbent with smaller particles may have shorter residence time in the furnace due to its higher elutriation level, which may cause a lower SO 2 removal efficiency [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase of SO 2 concentration always enhances the sulfation rate of the CaO, as shown in the research of Abanades et al [23] and Diego et al [11]. Smaller sorbent particle size is favorable for the reaction of CaO and SO 2 because of the larger specific surface area smaller particles has [10,24]. However, sorbent with smaller particles may have shorter residence time in the furnace due to its higher elutriation level, which may cause a lower SO 2 removal efficiency [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…There is an optimum temperature at about 850°C for the desulfurization using CaO in air-fired CFBBs [23,24], although a lower optimum temperature of 825°C was once reported by Tarelho et al [8]. The efficiency of SO 2 removal decreases with the increase in the bed temperature above the optimum value for sulfur capture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Both limestones reached ~70% of desulfurization efficiency. Other results of the limestones from southern Brazil used in desulfurization on bench and pilot scale can be found in the works of one of the authors (Bragança, 2003(Bragança, , 2009Sebag, 2001). The main disadvantage of the use of limestone Do is the smallest amount of calcium oxide (Table 2).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Limestones Do and D1 In Fbcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SO 2 capture is strongly affected by the temperature. High temperature will cause the sintering of sorbent particles and thermodynamic instability of CaSO 4 under reducing conditions, and low temperature will reduce the calcination rate and inhibit the pore development, thus the maximum sulfur capture efficiency in atmospheric fluidized beds is usually achieved at 850 °C or a little lower [7,8,9,10]. Limestones vary greatly in properties, and the geological properties also have strong influence on the reactivity of CaO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%