Modelo para alinhamento entre a maturidade dos sistemas de medição de desempenho e a maturidade da gestão da cadeia de suprimentos

Frederico, Guilherme F.; Martins, Roberto Antonio

doi:10.1590/s0104-530x2012000400014

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 27 publications

(25 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Authors such as Wettstein andKueng (2002), Van Aken et.al. (2005), Frederico and Martins (2012) and Frederico and Martins (2015) have proposed on the literature maturity frameworks in order to assess the evolutions of Performance Measurement Systems. Modern Performance Measurement Systems such as the Performance Prism (Neely, Adams and Crowe, 2001) and Balanced Scorecard (BSC) (Kaplan and Norton, 1996) take into consideration a balanced structure in order to have a more effective performance measurement process.…”

Section: Performance Measurementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance measurement for supply chains in the Industry 4.0 era: a balanced scorecard approach

Frederico

Garza‐Reyes

Kumar

et al. 2020

IJPPM

Self Cite

112

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present a theoretical approach based on the balanced scorecard (BSC) with regard to performance measurement – PM in supply chains for the Industry 4.0 era.Design/methodology/approachThis paper combines the literature of PM and specifically the BSC with the literature related to the dimensions of supply chain in the context of Industry 4.0.FindingsDimensions extracted from the literature based on supply chains within the context of Industry 4.0 showed a strong alignment with the four perspectives of the BSC, which make it suitable to be considered as a performance measurement system (PMS) for supply chains in this new context.Research limitations/implicationsFrom theoretical perspective, this study contributes to the limited literature on PM for supply chains in Industry 4.0 era. The study proposes a supply chain 4.0 Scorecard and strongly support researchers to conduct future empirical researches in order to get a deeper understanding about PM in supply chains in the Industry 4.0 era. As limitations, the theoretical framework proposed needs further empirical research in other to validate it and obtain new insights over the investigation conducted and presented into this paper.Practical implicationsPractitioners can use this study as a guide to develop more effective performance measurement systems – PMSs in their organizations.Originality/valueThis research is unique as it addresses a significant knowledge gap related to PM in supply chains in the Industry 4.0 era. It brings a significant contribution in terms of understanding how to measure performance in supply chains in this new era.

show abstract

Section: Performance Measurementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance measurement for supply chains in the Industry 4.0 era: a balanced scorecard approach

Frederico

Garza‐Reyes

Kumar

et al. 2020

IJPPM

Self Cite

112

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is essential that the systems and models developed incorporate the alignment between performance measurement systems and their maturity at the levels of supply chain management. In [57], the existence of a relationship between the maturity of the performance measurement system and the maturity of supply chain management has been identified.…”

Section: Relationship Between Maturity Models and Supply Chain Performance Measurement Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Maturity increases with the improvement of the implemented practices and technologies used to manage the supply chain [57][58][59][60][61].…”

Section: Performance Measurement Systems and Their Maturitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Proposal for a Maturity Model in Sustainability in the Supply Chain

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainability has become a relevant element for organizations due to several motivators: companies adopt sustainability practices in need for regulatory compliance, anticipation of regulatory changes, understanding of limited natural resources, and a desire to limit expenditure associated with resource consumption and waste disposal. Thus, this article aims to identify the gaps present in maturity models, present an integrator theoretical model that considers the characteristic elements of the models present in the literature and affects the level of maturity in sustainability. The construction of the integrator theoretical model was based on the following stages: research questions; theoretical framework on Supply Chain Management; sustainability and concept of maturity model; maturity models and performance measurement systems; interpretation/analysis of research; and construction of the integrator theoretical model. The literature review was carried out in the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The main conclusions: maturity models focus on only one aspect or are excessively broad and do not include in detail the elements necessary to measure the level of maturity in sustainability. The proposed model aims to mitigate these gaps with the addition of the cross-sectional dimension, which offers an integrated and holistic view in relation to the other dimensions.

show abstract

“…Models of measurement and evaluation of the variable performance were, at the time, more exploited than those dedicated to the study of other isolated areas of Logistics and SC, and further explored than models of systemic evaluation (multi-level stages, multi-variables and multi-dimensional) of agents and processes (Frederico & Martins, 2012). A confirmation of this vast literature related to the variable performance comparing with other components of Logistics and SC can be found in Estampe et al (2013), which presents a review of 16 models of performance measurement and evaluation.…”

Section: Maturity Models In the Supply Chain And Logisticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Model for alignment between performance measurement systems and maturity of supply chain management Frederico & Martins (2012) Staged, based on the integration of the methodology for maturity assessment of Lockamy III & McCormack (2004) procedure. The sample size is n = 3 (3 LSPs), with a population size of N = 7 (the 12 public concessions in Brazil are operated by 7 LSPs).…”

Section: Model Author Conceptual Orientationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The maturity of rail freight logistics service providers in Brazil

Bueno

Alencar

2015

Prod.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study analyzes the maturity of three rail freight Logistics Service Providers (LSPs) in Brazil in a population of seven operators. After an exploratory review of the existing literature and research documents, a structured questionnaire based on the Supply Chain Capability Maturity Model S(CM) 2 was applied. The study measured an overall average level, given in S(CM) 2 , as Managed, meaning that the managerial development standard of the logistics agents was at an intermediate level. The results showed that maturity was related to the size of the LSP and the complexity of the organizational management. These findings can support the development of policies and strategies for the improvement and adoption of practices that best lead to gains in competitiveness for both LSPs and the Supply Chains (SCs) that require their services. KeywordsSupply Chain capability maturity model S(CM) 2 . Rail freight. Logistics service providers.

show abstract

Modelo para alinhamento entre a maturidade dos sistemas de medição de desempenho e a maturidade da gestão da cadeia de suprimentos

Cited by 7 publications

References 27 publications

Performance measurement for supply chains in the Industry 4.0 era: a balanced scorecard approach

Performance measurement for supply chains in the Industry 4.0 era: a balanced scorecard approach

Proposal for a Maturity Model in Sustainability in the Supply Chain

The maturity of rail freight logistics service providers in Brazil

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About