Sistemática proposta para seleção de fornecedores em gestão de projetos

Alencar, Luciana Hazin; Almeida, Adiel Teixeira de; Mota, Caroline Maria de Miranda

doi:10.1590/s0104-530x2007000300005

Cited by 12 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, although the criterion "Cost" has great importance in other works (Poksinska et al, 2006;Golmohammadi and Mellat-Parast, 2012;Frade, 2013;Teixeira, 2010;Alencar et al, 2007;Daim et al, 2013;Peng, 2012;Tsaur and Lin, 2012;Wollmann et al, 2011), this situation was not observed in this study. Companies more oriented toward compliance than the actual adoption of quality requirements will decide based on low cost when selecting their certification body (Castka et al, 2015).…”

Section: Resultscontrasting

confidence: 74%

“…This finding is similar to the results obtained by Andrade and Albuquerque (2012), Chan and Chan (2010) and Mafakheri et al (2011), in which "Quality" was of great importance and "Cost" was one of the least prioritized criteria. Besides that, "Quality" was seen with great importance in manufacturing and service sector works (Golmohammadi and Mellat-Parast, 2012;Frade, 2013;Teixeira, 2010;Alencar et al, 2007;Daim et al, 2013;Tsaur and Lin, 2012). The results indicate that the certification bodies that perform high quality auditing would receive the preference of companies that want to certificate their QMS.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Ranking criteria for selection of certification bodies for ISO 9001 through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Alvarenga

Salgado

Mendes

2018

IJQRM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a framework to assist the selection of certification bodies in the implementation of quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001 taking into account a set of criteria organized in a multi-level hierarchical form. To deal with this complexity, the multi-criteria decision-making method (MCDM) analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was used in this research. Design/methodology/approach The research was conducted in small and medium-sized companies certified to ISO 9001. The MCDM method AHP was used as a method for developing the model to support the selection of certification bodies. Findings This paper provides a framework for companies seeking to hire certification bodies, mainly for ISO 9001 certification, which help identify the companies that best fit the certification objectives. Additionally, a ranking of the main criteria to select certification bodies for ISO 9001 was obtained. Research limitations/implications The decision-making method was applied to Brazilian companies from different sectors. As the results can vary between regions and sectors, this is a limitation of the research. In addition, the number of ten respondents could be higher to increase the robustness of the results. Practical implications The model assists companies looking for certification, mainly ISO 9001, in the selection of certification bodies contributing in the search for deeper implementations of QMS. Originality/value This work has the originality of the application of a decision-making method in the final process of ISO 9001 certification, scarce in the literature. In addition, it defines weights for the criteria involved in the process of selecting certification bodies.

show abstract

Section: Resultscontrasting

confidence: 74%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Ranking criteria for selection of certification bodies for ISO 9001 through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Alvarenga

Salgado

Mendes

2018

IJQRM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The first approach is to bring together different points of view within a single function synthesis which can be further optimized. The second is mainly used for troubleshooting of multiple objectives that require a more robust mathematical programming and the third results in a ratio overon a set of alternatives from alternatives paired comparisons (Alencar, 2006;Almeida, 2005;Roy, 1996).…”

Section: The Multicriteria Problem and The Promethee Methods IImentioning

confidence: 99%

Multicriteria evaluation model for organizational performance management applied to the Polo Fruit Exporter of the São Francisco Valley

Silva

Fontes

Barbosa

2015

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…As stated by Alencar et al (2007), the phases of a life cycle can vary according to the nature of the project, but overall, they include viability (initial phase), planning, execution, control, and completion. Different people can manage each of these phases, and not everyone on the team will be involved project.…”

Section: Project Managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of statistical analysis to improve time management of a process modeling project

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work was the result of a cooperation agreement between the University of Brasilia (UnB) and a security organization. Its goal was to model the logistic processes of the company to assist in the modernization of a control system for the management of materials. The project was managed in a dynamic model, through the monitoring and control of activities executed during its various stages. The development of a control system enabled the detection of discrepancies between what was planned and how it was performed, identifying its causes and which actions to take to ensure that the project got back on track according to the planned schedule and budget. The main objective of this article was to identify which elements controlled by the project affected its execution time. With that knowledge, it was possible to improve the planning of the next phases of the project. To this end, we performed a case study of exploratory aspect and quantitative nature to provide information on the object and guide the formulation of hypotheses. The qualitative analysis of the execution time of the modeling identified two dependent variables - systematic version and team - out of the four evaluated. The quantitative analysis studied two variables - number of modifications and number of elements -, which did not indicate evidence of correlation with the aforementioned time.

show abstract

Sistemática proposta para seleção de fornecedores em gestão de projetos

Cited by 12 publications

References 35 publications

Ranking criteria for selection of certification bodies for ISO 9001 through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Ranking criteria for selection of certification bodies for ISO 9001 through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Multicriteria evaluation model for organizational performance management applied to the Polo Fruit Exporter of the São Francisco Valley

Application of statistical analysis to improve time management of a process modeling project

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About