2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-14282013005000001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mistura polipropileno/poliestireno: um exemplo da relação processamento-estrutura-propriedade no ensino de polímeros

Abstract: IntroduçãoAs misturas ou blendas poliméricas continuam, apesar de seu longo estudo, a ser foco de pesquisas em diferentes áreas. Nesta área, a mistura de polipropileno e poliestireno é uma das mais estudadas principalmente pelo baixo custo e relevância tecnológica destes materiais [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] . Por outro lado, a compreensão das relações processamentoestrutura-propriedade em misturas poliméricas de sistemas conhecido pode ser, e frequentemente é utilizado para explicar os comportamentos observados em … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The voids that appear in the micrograph are a result of the separation of the blend components when the impact force is applied, an indication of a weak interphase interaction40,41 .A similar behavior was reported by Pachekoski et al42 , who examined PHB/PP mixtures after processing. Other studies report the immiscibility of polymer blends of morphologies similar to the one found in this research40,[43][44][45] .It can be observed that the size of the PHB phase increases with the number of reprocessing cycles, which is more visible in the seventh cycle (Figure4d). These results are thought to indicate that the intense shear causes the coalescence of the PHB phase in the blend.Figure5shows the micrographs of the reprocessed nanocomposite.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…The voids that appear in the micrograph are a result of the separation of the blend components when the impact force is applied, an indication of a weak interphase interaction40,41 .A similar behavior was reported by Pachekoski et al42 , who examined PHB/PP mixtures after processing. Other studies report the immiscibility of polymer blends of morphologies similar to the one found in this research40,[43][44][45] .It can be observed that the size of the PHB phase increases with the number of reprocessing cycles, which is more visible in the seventh cycle (Figure4d). These results are thought to indicate that the intense shear causes the coalescence of the PHB phase in the blend.Figure5shows the micrographs of the reprocessed nanocomposite.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…PP H103 and R BB have higher T c , which may be associated to smaller polymer chains. PP H103 has higher MFR (40 g/10 min), this fact may improve crystallization (nucleation and growth), as already reported by Oliveira et al (2012) 21 . In addition, the presence of impurities can contribute to a higher crystallization rates, they may act as activation centers for new crystals 22 .…”
Section: Differential Scanning Calorimetry (Dsc)supporting
confidence: 69%
“…PP presented a single thermal decomposition step, with weight loss in the range from 290 to 430 C, similarly to the reported in the literature. [73] EPDM-MA is thermally more stable than PP, since the initial degradation was around 430 C. PA6 displayed higher thermal stability than PP, with a single degradation step in the range from 415 to 490 C; however, PA6 showed a subtle decline in TG plot between 80 and 170 C, due to moisture loss, and in this case, it is a physical event. Similar behavior was verified by Anjos et al [74] in PA6/PE blends compatibilized with PE-g-MA.…”
Section: Thermogravimetrymentioning
confidence: 92%