2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-11692006000600007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sleep quality of women with gynecological and breast cancer

Abstract: Subjective sleep quality has been recognized as a valuable indicator of health and quality of life. This exploratory and descriptive study aimed at describing habitual sleep quality of women suffering from gynecological and breast cancer and comparing habitual versus sleep quality during hospitalization. Twenty-five women admitted in hospital for clinical treatment of cancer completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) within 72 hours after admission and again just before discharge. Fifty-two percent of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
15

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
19
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…A study (8) The site of cancer was also a statistically significant variable (p=0.023). It is known that the site and stage of the disease determine the kind of treatment chosen and also affect the recovery and quality of life of those who survive it (14) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A study (8) The site of cancer was also a statistically significant variable (p=0.023). It is known that the site and stage of the disease determine the kind of treatment chosen and also affect the recovery and quality of life of those who survive it (14) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cancer patients who were submitted to specific treatments in the last six months were more subject to problems of excessive somnolence (8) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It was used a methodology proposed for calculating the sample size for an unpaired t-test, considering a study in which the group of subjects with clinical improvement had an average of 7.2 points and a standard deviation of 4.4 points in the score of the instrument that assesses the sleep quality, and those with clinical worsening obtained an average of 10.3 and a standard deviation of 3.8 points in the ratio of 15% of subjects with clinical worsening; (15) significance level of 5%; power of 80%. The calculated sample size was of 121 subjects, among which 18 should present clinical worsening.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%