2004
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162004000400013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alfalfa yield and quality as function of nitrogen fertilization and symbiosis with Sinorhizobium meliloti

Abstract: The efficiency of the symbiotic process between alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and Sinorhizobium meliloti can be drastically affected by soil nitrogen. This research evaluates how mineral fertilization affects the contribution of symbiosis to the yield and quality of alfalfa in two experiments under controlled conditions, and a third one in the field. Under controlled conditions, positive effect of nitrogen fertilizer was observed, whereas, in the field, negative effect of the mineral nitrogen (450 kg ha -1 year… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
18
3
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
18
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With increasing doses of mineral nitrogen fertilization crude protein content increased by 13 to 19%. Our results do not support suggestion that mineral nitrogen fertilization had no effect on the concentration of nitrogen and crude protein content in lucerne [OLIVEIRA et al, 2004] . With increasing doses of mineral nitrogen fertilization under water deficiency stress crude protein content increased significantly by 6 to 14%.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…With increasing doses of mineral nitrogen fertilization crude protein content increased by 13 to 19%. Our results do not support suggestion that mineral nitrogen fertilization had no effect on the concentration of nitrogen and crude protein content in lucerne [OLIVEIRA et al, 2004] . With increasing doses of mineral nitrogen fertilization under water deficiency stress crude protein content increased significantly by 6 to 14%.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…We observed lower N values than Oliveira et al (2004) who evaluated N in alfalfa cultivars in green house experiments and found higher N concentrations in plants treated with the highest dose (16 mmol N L -1 ); however, they did not detect differences between cultivars. Another factor that could have caused such low N concentrations in our experiment soil pH index which was slightly lower at the end of the experiment than the value of 6.8 recommended by Honda and Honda (1990); low pH values can damage N 2 fixation efficiency in Sinorhizobium meliloti.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…Lloveras et al (2000) also found no significant difference in the concentration of crude protein in an alfalfa experiment with an N application of 30 kg ha -1 yr of nitrogen; however, the protein concentration was higher (20.04 to 23.58%). Oliveira et al (2004) found significantly higher N concentrations in an experiment using nitrogen rate eight times higher than the control in the greenhouse; however, they found no significant difference in a field experiment with applications of 450 kg nitrogen ha -1 yr -1 . Means followed by different capital letters differ significantly by Duncan´s test at 5% probability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Although legumes are able to use available soil N, they appear to be outperformed by grasses in the competition for that nutrient in grass-clover mixed swards due to their shorter root system (Wilman & Fisher, 1996). Additionally, there is evidence of detrimental effects of N supply on the nitrogen fixing bacteria of the nodulated legumes (Carlsson & Huss-Danell, 2003;Oliveira et al, 2004). All these factors could explain the decrease in legume proportion and, consequently, in CP content of the herbage collected in the regrowths associated to the application of a higher amount of N fertilizer (Tables 2 and 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%