2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782009005000199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensão e extração de água em mesa de tensão e coluna de areia, em dois solos com elevada densidade

Abstract: III

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The undisturbed soil samples were used to evaluate soil water retention. The samples were saturated in plastic containers by capillary action for 48 h, and then equilibrated to -1, -6, and -10 kPa matric potential on a tension table (Reinert and Reichert, 2006;Gubiani et al, 2009) and to -33, -70, and -100 kPa on pressure plates (Klute, 1986). Water retention at lower matric potentials of -500, -1000, and -1500 kPa was determined using the Dewpoint PotentiaMeter (WP4, Decagon Incorporation, USA), following the methodology by Klein et al (2006) and modified by Gubiani et al (2013), using air-dried and homogenized soil samples after passing through a 2-mm sieve.…”
Section: Soil Water Porosity Bulk Density and Degree Of Compactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The undisturbed soil samples were used to evaluate soil water retention. The samples were saturated in plastic containers by capillary action for 48 h, and then equilibrated to -1, -6, and -10 kPa matric potential on a tension table (Reinert and Reichert, 2006;Gubiani et al, 2009) and to -33, -70, and -100 kPa on pressure plates (Klute, 1986). Water retention at lower matric potentials of -500, -1000, and -1500 kPa was determined using the Dewpoint PotentiaMeter (WP4, Decagon Incorporation, USA), following the methodology by Klein et al (2006) and modified by Gubiani et al (2013), using air-dried and homogenized soil samples after passing through a 2-mm sieve.…”
Section: Soil Water Porosity Bulk Density and Degree Of Compactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the soil water retention curve (WRC) and porosity, samples (three repetitions) were saturated for 48 h and weighed. Then, they were taken to a sand tension table, subjecting to tensions of 1, 6, and 10 kPa (Gubiani et al, 2009) and Richards chambers under 33, 100, 300, 500, and 1500 kPa (Libardi, 2005). With the data of tension and volumetric moisture, the WRC was fitted (van Genuchten, 1980) using a soil water retention curve software (Dourado Neto et al, 2000).…”
Section: = 100 × (Bd/bd M )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The L and I were considered as subplots. The soil porosity and bulk density were determined according to Gubiani et al (2009). The stability of aggregates was determined by wet sieve, and expressed by the weighted mean diameter (WMD) (Kemper & Chepil, 1965).…”
Section: Injeção De Dejeto Líquido De Suínos E Efeitos Sobre As Proprmentioning
confidence: 99%