Porcas lactantes alimentadas com dietas contendo silagem de grãos úmidos de milho e ácidos orgânicos

Lovatto, Paulo Alberto; Weschenfelder, Volnei Antônio; Rossi, Carlos Augusto Rigon; Lehnen, Cheila Roberta; Andretta, Inés

doi:10.1590/s0103-84782009005000029

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A distribuição entre espécies foi: 11 trabalhos com bovinos (Berndt et al, 2002;Passini et al, 2003;Henrique et al, 2007;Silva et al, 2007;Putrino et al, 2007;Almeida Junior et al, 2008a, Almeida Junior et al, 2008bAlmeida Junior et al, 2008c;Igarasi et al, 2008a;Igarasi et al, 2008b;Almeida Junior et al, 2008d), três com ovinos (Reis et al, 2001;Almeida Junior et al, 2004a;Almeida Junior et al, 2004b) , quatro com suínos (Oliveira et al, 2004;Silva et al, 2005;Patrício et al, 2006;Lovatto et al, 2009), dois com eqüídeos (Santos et al, 2002;Oliveira et al, 2007) …”

Section: Methodsunclassified

Grão úmido na alimentação animal: estudo metanalítico

Teodoro¹,

Vargas²,

Oliveira³

et al. 2015

Pubvet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumoO presente trabalho teve como objetivo realizar um estudo metanalítico para analisar os artigos publicados sobre a utilização de silagem grãos úmidos na alimentação animal entre os anos de 2000 e 2011, para tanto pesquisou-se todos os trabalhos publicados nesses anos nas revistas: Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia e Ciência Rural, admitindo-se apenas artigos que tenham tratamento controle e que avaliaram desempenho, característica de carcaça e parâmetros digestivos, com ou sem análise econômica. Os trabalhos foram tabulados em planilhas eletrônicas (Excel) e comparou-se todos os tratamentos com seus respectivos controle, chegando-se a conclusão que o

show abstract

Section: Methodsunclassified

Grão úmido na alimentação animal: estudo metanalítico

Teodoro¹,

Vargas²,

Oliveira³

et al. 2015

Pubvet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…From the studies extracted by the applicant, the FEEDAP Panel noted that only two studies could be used to assess safety of the additive for sows. Lovatto et al (2009) performed a study with 15 gestating-lactating sows (Large White 9 Landrace, first to eighth parity) during 23 days (from day 2 preparturition to day 21 lactation). The animals were used in a randomised complete block with three treatments (control diet containing high moisture maize, control diet with benzoic acid at 5,000 mg/kg (2 9 maximum recommended dose) and control diet with 5,000 mg fumaric acid/kg feed) with five sows each.…”

Section: Studies In Sowsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Safety and efficacy of benzoic acid for pigs and poultry

Additives¹,

Rychen²,

Aquilina³

et al. 2018

EFS2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked by the European Commission to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of benzoic acid as feed flavouring for piglets (suckling, weaned), pigs for fattening, sows (for reproduction, in order to have benefit in piglets), minor porcine species, chickens (for fattening, reared for laying), hens (laying, breeding), turkeys (for fattening, for breeding purposes, reared for breeding) and minor poultry species. Benzoic acid is safe for weaned piglets at 2,500 mg/kg feed, and for laying hens, turkeys and chickens for fattening at 500 mg/kg feed; no conclusions could be drawn for suckling piglets and sows. The conclusions on weaned piglets can be extended to pigs for fattening and extrapolated to growing minor porcine species. The conclusions on chickens/turkeys for fattening can be extended to chickens reared for laying and turkeys reared for breeding and extrapolated to minor poultry species up to the point of lay. In the absence of safety margin in laying hens, no conclusions can be reached for minor poultry species for laying/breeding. The use of the additive is not expected to pose a risk to consumer, considering that the additive is rapidly metabolised with very low deposition, if any, in edible tissues of pigs and poultry and that foods of animal origin provide a very minor contribution, if any, to the overall dietary intake of benzoic acid. Owing to the unlikelihood of exposure, no risk to users upon inhalation of the additive is expected; the additive is not a skin sensitiser, but is a skin/ eye irritant. The proposed use of the additive does not pose environmental risks. Benzoic acid is authorised as food flavouring and its function in feed is essentially the same; no further demonstration of efficacy is necessary.

show abstract

Porcas lactantes alimentadas com dietas contendo silagem de grãos úmidos de milho e ácidos orgânicos

Cited by 2 publications

References 7 publications

Grão úmido na alimentação animal: estudo metanalítico

Grão úmido na alimentação animal: estudo metanalítico

Safety and efficacy of benzoic acid for pigs and poultry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About