2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-84782005000200018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desempenho de um trator em função do tipo de pneu, da lastragem e da velocidade de trabalho

Abstract: O trabalho comparou o desempenho de um trator agrícola 4x2 TDA de 89 kW (121cv) em função do tipo de pneus (radial, diagonal e de baixa pressão), a condição de lastragem (com e sem água nos pneus) e quatro velocidades [V1 (1,84km h-1), V2 (3,18km h-1, V3 (4,57km h-1), V4 (5,04km h-1)]. O experimento foi realizado na UNESP-Jaboticabal-SP, em condição de preparo do solo com escarificador de sete hastes a 30cm de profundidade. Os pneus foram do tipo R1, com as seguintes características: [radial (dianteiros-14.9 R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
2
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
3
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific consumption for different ballasts was not significant. These results disagree with those observed by Lopes et al (2005), who evaluating the performance of an agricultural tractor 4 x 2 TDA, of 89 kW (121 cv (hp)) maximum engine power, pulling a drag scarifier combined with a harrowing roller and cutting wheels with seven angled straight rods and ferrules without wing with 7 cm wide, the lowest specific consumption found with ballasting being 75% of water in the tire. For consumption per area the result of variance analysis was significant for the working depth factor, being greater in depth of 0.40 m result that may be associated with greater ground area mobilized by scarifier rods and also by higher tensile force required by the equipment to overcome the resistance offered by the soil.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The specific consumption for different ballasts was not significant. These results disagree with those observed by Lopes et al (2005), who evaluating the performance of an agricultural tractor 4 x 2 TDA, of 89 kW (121 cv (hp)) maximum engine power, pulling a drag scarifier combined with a harrowing roller and cutting wheels with seven angled straight rods and ferrules without wing with 7 cm wide, the lowest specific consumption found with ballasting being 75% of water in the tire. For consumption per area the result of variance analysis was significant for the working depth factor, being greater in depth of 0.40 m result that may be associated with greater ground area mobilized by scarifier rods and also by higher tensile force required by the equipment to overcome the resistance offered by the soil.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…It can be observed in the unfolding of the ballasting in the depths (C) that the only one that differed significantly was L1, corresponding to 0% of liquid ballast, with the lowest value in the depth P3 (0.40 m) a result that may be associated with higher slippage of the tractor in that same treatment that contributed to reduce the speed and consequently lower the overall work rate. Lopes et al (2005) evaluating the performance of a tractor on red eutroferric Oxisol also found that the field capacity was lower when he worked without liquid ballast in the tire. According to the values presented for the unfolding of the depths within the ballasting (D), it is observed that only the depth P3 (0.40 m) shows significant difference with lower values in the evaluated ballasting L1 and L2 (0 and 75% water), a result that can be associated with the fact that greater working depth mobilize greater ground area P1 -0.26; P2 -0.32 and P3-0.46 m 2 respectively, contributing for speed reduction, directly affecting the overall work rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assim Levien (1999), utilizando-se do mesmo trator, escarificador e tipo de solo, operando a uma profundidade média de 17 cm, encontrou valores inferiores para os parâmetros: velocidade média (2,62 km h -1 ), força média de tração (38,22 kN), potência média de tração (27,78kW) e capacidade de campo teórica (0,73 ha h -1 ). Enquanto Lopes et al (2005), utilizando-se também do mesmo trator, tipo de pneu e trabalhando com o escarificador composto de 7 hastes, com uma profundidade média de 30 cm, constataram uma potência média inferior a 22,66kW. A potência encontrada nesse estudo foi de 33,21 kW, pois o mesmo trabalhou com uma velocidade maior 3,18 km ha -1 .…”
Section: Profundidadeunclassified
“…Os autores obtiveram valores superiores para força e potência média de tração. Na operação de gradagem pesada Lopes et al (2005), utilizando-se trator JD 6600 encontraram valores semelhantes para a grade pesada, não diferindo da capacidade de campo teórica encontrada no presente trabalho que foi de 1,12 e 1,10, pois os referidos autores encontraram valores acima de 1,01 ha -1 .…”
Section: Profundidadeunclassified