2015
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-73312015000400012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Manifestações de sofrimento: dilemas e desafios para a vigilância em saúde do trabalhador

Abstract: O artigo aborda as relações complexas e desafiadoras entre as manifestações de sofrimento dos trabalhadores e as práticas da vigilância em saúde. O objetivo deste ensaio é realizar uma análise crítica dos desafios e dilemas relativos à integração da saúde mental no escopo da vigilância em saúde do trabalhador no Sistema Único de Saúde. Percebemos processos de patologização dos trabalhadores em jogo nas práticas disponíveis na rede de saúde pública. Por isso, com base no pensamento de autores como Agamben, Guat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Daldon and Lancman 23 confront the development of the VISAT, incorporating the acting, conscious worker with the current panorama of limitation of material and human resources, and of little investment in technical training, showing that the strategy of adding this actor to the Surveillance process is still a work in progress. However, it is worth stressing that the active participation of the workers as a crucial point for the development of the VISAT is an aspect highlighted by practically all the authors that produce research on this subject 17,21,24,25 .…”
Section: Policies In Work Relatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Daldon and Lancman 23 confront the development of the VISAT, incorporating the acting, conscious worker with the current panorama of limitation of material and human resources, and of little investment in technical training, showing that the strategy of adding this actor to the Surveillance process is still a work in progress. However, it is worth stressing that the active participation of the workers as a crucial point for the development of the VISAT is an aspect highlighted by practically all the authors that produce research on this subject 17,21,24,25 .…”
Section: Policies In Work Relatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, tied to this diffuse tangle of actions, the predominant models of care in the VISAT actions in Mental Health are based on medical, outpatient perspectives, of a curative character and therefore reductionist [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] , clashing with the comprehensive conceptions of the psychosocial model defended in the Organic Health Law (Lei Orgânica de Saúde). Daldon and Lancman 23 stress the need for the decentralization of services as essential to the VISAT strategies, giving emphasis to the role of Primary Care and to the Community Health Agents as an alternative of first contact for the SUS service, in worker health as well as in mental health and work.…”
Section: Actions and Interventions In The Visat And Smrt Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On Table 4 , we descriptively analyze the percentage of articles per theoretical contribution; 35.7% (n = 5) approached “workers’ health surveillance”. 18 , 19 , 21 , 22 , 24 On the other hand, the less frequently observed theoretical contribution was “theoretical-methodological critical appraisal of work-related mental health”, 20 with only 7.1% of prevalence (n = 1); this was the only foreign study included in this review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Table 5 shows a descriptive analysis of the percentage of methodological tools used in the investigation of research on occupational mental health. The result showed a bigger emphasis on the use of interviews, 14 , 18 , 23 , 25 - 27 all of which were semi-structured, with 42.9% (n = 6) of the studies, and document analysis of directives, legislation, medical records, and social security data, 16 , 17 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 24 with 35.7% of the studies (n = 5). The least frequently used methods were participant observation and focus group, 15 both in 7.1 % (n = 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation