Adaptação da “The Resilience Scale” para a população adulta portuguesa

Deep, Cláudia Alexandra Ferreira de Carvalho Ng; Leal, Isabel

doi:10.1590/s0103-65642012005000008

Cited by 14 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The first tertile (scores # 17) was assumed to represent low psychological resilience, the second (scores from 18 to 24) moderate psychological resilience, and the third (scores $ 25) high psychological resilience. 13,14 Statistical analysis Data analysis was conducted using IBM Statistics SPSS 26. An analysis using descriptive statistics was conducted to demonstrate the demographic and other selected characteristics of the respondents.…”

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychological burden in Portuguese university students during the COVID-19 pandemic

Tavares-Almeida¹,

Moura²,

Madeira³

et al. 2023

Porto Biomedical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:University students are a risk population for mental health problems. This study aims to evaluate the psychological burden of the COVID-19 pandemic in Portuguese university students and to uncover factors associated with worse psychological indicators.Methods:We used an online survey to perform a cross-sectional study that evaluated students' perceptions, lifestyle, and psychological well-being during the pandemic. Depression symptoms and risk were measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and resilience levels were quantified by the 9-item Resilience Evaluation Scale. Self-perceived levels of anxiety and current mental health status were evaluated.Results:From a population of around 30,000 students invited to participate, 1751 responses were obtained and 1447 were included. Most students were female (72.3%) and were taking a master's degree (58.4%). The course with more responses was engineering (25.5%), followed by medicine (13.2%). The prevalence rates for higher anxiety levels, depression risk, and low resilience levels were 66.7%, 37.3%, and 24.9%, respectively. The factors associated with better psychological outcomes were being male, spending more time studying, having a job, performing extracurricular activities, physical exercise, and relaxing activities. By contrast, spending more time watching news, difficulty accessing online lectures, and absence of contact with family or friends were associated with worse psychological indicators. Although all courses presented substantial levels of depressive symptoms, architectures/arts, sciences, and humanities scored significantly more in the depression scale. Medicine students had significantly higher resilience levels compared with other courses.Conclusions:Our findings identify factors associated with worse psychological outcomes and can be used to create protective measures for the mental health of university students during current and future pandemics.

show abstract

Section: Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychological burden in Portuguese university students during the COVID-19 pandemic

Tavares-Almeida¹,

Moura²,

Madeira³

et al. 2023

Porto Biomedical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Por fim, Deep e Leal, 41 no estudo das propriedades métricas da ER, verificaram que as análises iniciais sugeriam a existência de seis fatores que explicavam 56,7% da variância. No entanto, seguiram o procedimento da escala original e obtiveram quatro fatores, tendo sido eliminados dois itens (itens 1 e 7), com uma variância total explicada de 47,2%, e com um α de 0,87 para 23 itens.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Resiliência em Médicos: Contributos para a Validação da Versão Portuguesa da Escala de Resiliência

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The aim of this study is to explore the validation of the Resilience Scale in its long and brief versions (25 items and 14 items). This instrument assesses the individual’s ability to withstand stressors, thrive and make sense of vital challenges.Material and Methods: The sample included 511 Portuguese physicians. Both versions were validated through the study of internal structure validity, reliability, and convergent validity. The validity of the internal structure was analysed using the principal component analysis technique. Reliability was verified by the internal consistency study. For convergent validity, the correlation coefficients between these versions of the Resilience Scale and other scales validated to measure depression, anxiety, stress, and life satisfaction were calculated.Results: Both versions of Resilience Scale showed good internal consistency. For each of the versions, one factor was retained in the principal component analysis. Convergent validity was verified by significant positive correlations between Resilience Scale (25 and 14) and a life satisfaction scale and significant negative correlations between Resilience Scale and depression, anxiety, and stress subscales.Discussion: The results show the one-dimensional character of both versions of the Resilience Scale and support their usefulness and validity in the physician’s class. Conclusion: This is the first validation study of this scale in a group of physicians. Its results are very satisfactory, and its use in this specific group is recommended.

show abstract

“…Portanto, empregou-se a AFC com a finalidade de avaliar, em primeira instância, se o modelo unifatorial seria o mais adequado, pois, conforme apresentado por diversos pesquisadores, como Prince-Embury, Saklofkes e Keefer (2017), os primeiros modelos teóricos acerca do construto defendiam que a resiliência seria um atributo unidimensional. Também considerando que o processo de refinamento dos modelos teóricos voltados à resiliência propuseram, ao longo dos anos, modelos multidimensionais (Castillo et al, 2016;Deep & Pereira, 2012;Infante, 2007;Junqueira & Deslandes, 2003;Masten, 2001Masten, , 2014Masten, , 2018Masten, , 2021Prince-Embury, 2010;Yunes, 2011), buscou-se, também, comparar a adequação dos seguintes modelos multifatoriais: oblíquo, de segunda ordem e Bi-factor, que se diferenciam em função da forma como as variáveis se relacionam entre si e hipoteticamente são alinhados às propostas de modelos teóricos multidimensionais, destacando-se o de Castillo et al (2016), que sugere que a resiliência é o produto da relação intrínseca entre seis elementos fundamentais.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Marcadores de Resiliência Infantil: Evidências de Validade para Estrutura Interna e Precisão

Oliveira

Nakano

Peixoto

2021

Psicol. cienc. prof.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumo A resiliência tem sido considerada um construto importante para o enfrentamento de situações adversas. Em que pese sua relevância, nenhum instrumento brasileiro encontra-se disponível para sua avaliação, especialmente na infância. Diante dessa lacuna, o objetivo deste estudo foi buscar evidências de validade baseadas na estrutura interna e na precisão do instrumento Marcadores de Resiliência Infantil (MRI), que busca verificar a presença ou ausência de indicadores de potenciais resilientes em crianças com idades entre oito e 12 anos. Participaram 461 crianças, das quais 223 eram meninas, de escolas públicas e particulares. Através do modelo Bi-factor, os resultados confirmaram o modelo teórico que serviu de base para sua construção, indicando a presença de seis fatores específicos e um fator geral (vulnerabilidade, coping, inteligência emocional, habilidade, bem-estar subjetivo, locus de controle) representados em 22 itens. Os coeficientes de alfa de Cronbach apontaram para adequação dos fatores Locus de controle, Coping e Total. É possível concluir que foram alcançadas evidências iniciais relacionadas à validade e à precisão do instrumento. Sugere-se que outros estudos sejam realizados a fim de compreender, de forma aprofundada, as qualidades psicométricas desse instrumento.

show abstract

Adaptação da “The Resilience Scale” para a população adulta portuguesa

Cited by 14 publications

References 5 publications

Psychological burden in Portuguese university students during the COVID-19 pandemic

Psychological burden in Portuguese university students during the COVID-19 pandemic

Resiliência em Médicos: Contributos para a Validação da Versão Portuguesa da Escala de Resiliência

Marcadores de Resiliência Infantil: Evidências de Validade para Estrutura Interna e Precisão

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About