2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402006000400014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An unusual case of talon cusp on a geminated tooth

Abstract: Talon cusp is a developmental anomaly seen on the lingual surface of anterior teeth. Gemination is an anomaly caused by a single tooth germ that attempted to divide during its development. These developmental anomalies may cause clinical problems including esthetic impairment, pain, caries and tooth crowding. This paper presents an unusual case of gemination accompanied by talon cusp in permanent dentition. The clinical and radiographic findings are described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21: 391-406 (2011 odontomes (Natkin et al, 1983); peg-shaped incisors (Mellor & Ripa, 1970;Mader, 1981); and shovelshaped incisors (Dayal et al, 1980;Davis & Brook, 1986;Acs et al, 1992;Hattab et al, 1995;Al-Omari et al, 1999;Lorena et al, 2003;Sharma, 2006). Recent research has highlighted the co-occurrence of talon cusp and fusion-the joining of two adjacent tooth germs to form a single large tooth- (Hasiakos et al, 1986;Taloumis & Nishimura, 1989), geminationwhen a single tooth germ attempts to form two teeth- (Cullen & Pangrazio-Culbersh, 1985;Al-Omari et al, 1999;Hattab & Hazza'a, 2001;Cubukcu et al, 2006;Gü ndü z & Açikgõ z, 2006;Agnihotri et al, 2007), and double tooth-the preferred designation when differential diagnosis between fusion and gemination is not possible-in the same dental element of the permanent (Lomçali et al, 1994;Li, 2002;Mayes, 2007;Ekambaram et al, 2008) and deciduous (Mays, 2005;Halcrow & Tayles, 2008;Silva & Subtil, 2009) dentitions.…”
Section: Clinical Associations Of Talon Cuspsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21: 391-406 (2011 odontomes (Natkin et al, 1983); peg-shaped incisors (Mellor & Ripa, 1970;Mader, 1981); and shovelshaped incisors (Dayal et al, 1980;Davis & Brook, 1986;Acs et al, 1992;Hattab et al, 1995;Al-Omari et al, 1999;Lorena et al, 2003;Sharma, 2006). Recent research has highlighted the co-occurrence of talon cusp and fusion-the joining of two adjacent tooth germs to form a single large tooth- (Hasiakos et al, 1986;Taloumis & Nishimura, 1989), geminationwhen a single tooth germ attempts to form two teeth- (Cullen & Pangrazio-Culbersh, 1985;Al-Omari et al, 1999;Hattab & Hazza'a, 2001;Cubukcu et al, 2006;Gü ndü z & Açikgõ z, 2006;Agnihotri et al, 2007), and double tooth-the preferred designation when differential diagnosis between fusion and gemination is not possible-in the same dental element of the permanent (Lomçali et al, 1994;Li, 2002;Mayes, 2007;Ekambaram et al, 2008) and deciduous (Mays, 2005;Halcrow & Tayles, 2008;Silva & Subtil, 2009) dentitions.…”
Section: Clinical Associations Of Talon Cuspsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The age range varied across studies from 7 to 60 years. For 12 of the 72 cases, the double tooth was associated with dens evaginatus 17 25 26 29 46 51 58 67 69. Double tooth was bilateral in 29 cases (40%), so we describe 101 permanent maxillary central incisors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nevertheless, periapical radiographs represent two-dimensional (2D) dental imaging and cannot be accurate and conclusive 25 77. CBCT is an interesting alternative because it provides 3D dental imaging 78 79.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, periapical radiographs are 2D dental imaging and are not accurate or conclusive 20 44. Moreover, CBCT provides submillimetre spatial resolution with short exposure times in the range of 20 s and radiation exposure similar to a full mouth series 45–48.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%