2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-50532008000200009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bond indices in dihydrogen bonds

Abstract: Os índices de ligação de três centros levam a uma descrição nova da ligação di-hidrogênio XH...H M como sendo uma superposição de uma ponte de hidrogênio usual XHH , mais uma ponte de hidrogênio forte HH M. O índice de ligação de quatro centros é negativo e o seu valor é intermediário entre os anteriores. Three-center bond indices lead to a new description for dihydrogen bonds XH…H M: it may be mainly described as a superposition of a usual hydrogen bond XHH and a strong hydrogen bond HH M. The four-center bon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this form the C3−C5 bond length increases from 1.45 (S1) to 1.59 Å (S2), and the O2−O3 bond was also found to be longer, 1.49 Å, compared to 1.22 Å for 1 O 2 molecule. The weakness of these bonds upon the oxygen adsorption is confirmed by analyzing the Wiberg bond index (Wbi), which decreases from 1.18 (C3−C5 in S1) and 2.02 (O−O, molecular oxygen) to 0.89 and 0.98 in the S2 structure, respectively. It is also interesting to notice that the O 2 is chemically bound to the tube surface, with the Wbi factor found to be 0.85 for C3−O2 and C5−O3 (S2 structure), characterizing a single bond.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this form the C3−C5 bond length increases from 1.45 (S1) to 1.59 Å (S2), and the O2−O3 bond was also found to be longer, 1.49 Å, compared to 1.22 Å for 1 O 2 molecule. The weakness of these bonds upon the oxygen adsorption is confirmed by analyzing the Wiberg bond index (Wbi), which decreases from 1.18 (C3−C5 in S1) and 2.02 (O−O, molecular oxygen) to 0.89 and 0.98 in the S2 structure, respectively. It is also interesting to notice that the O 2 is chemically bound to the tube surface, with the Wbi factor found to be 0.85 for C3−O2 and C5−O3 (S2 structure), characterizing a single bond.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Nevertheless, after the dihydrogen bonds were discovered, 176 intermolecular chemistry has expanded to new horizons, such as studies of solid state, catalysis, crystal engineering, and materials chemistry. [315][316][317] Among these, many other works about dihydrogen bonds 180,318,319 are conducted by means of theoretical analysis in small systems, [320][321][322] generally those where M is beryllium, aluminium, gallium, silicon, or germanium. 323a However, the literature reports that beryllium hydride (BeH 2 ) is the most efficient proton acceptor to be used in the formation of dihydrogen-bonded systems.…”
Section: Boaz Galdino De Oliveiramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the use of multicenter indices to characterize dihydrogen bonds was very recently studied by Giambiagi and Bultinck . It was found there that there is a very good correlation between the size of the multicenter indices on the one hand and the interaction energies on the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%