Dependência: da teoria à prática

Batista, Paulo Nogueira

doi:10.1590/s0103-40141999000300012

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nevertheless, the conjuncture of the 1990s was substantially different from that of the 1950s and 1960s. The discursive reframing of developmentalist ideas in that new scenario, defined by what Cardoso increasingly called "globalization" (Batista Jr., 1999), marks a crucial jump from classical developmentalism to neodevelopmentalism through the hoops of his dependency theory. The example of the Asian Tigers, which "managed their economies sensibly" and took advantage of the changes in international capitalism to "develop," would become a constant in neodevelopmentalist discourse.…”

Section: : the Political Birth Of Neodevelopmentalismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lost and Found: Bourgeois Dependency Theory and the Forgotten Roots of Neodevelopmentalism

Oliveira¹

2021

Latin American Perspectives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Neodevelopmentalism emerged in Brazil and Argentina in the aftermath of the demoralization of the Washington Consensus. Although its intellectual proponents place it within the long tradition of Latin American developmentalism, an important theoretical origin of neodevelopmentalism—dependency theory—has so far been ignored. The term appeared for the first time in 1978 as an expletive in the heated controversy between Ruy Mauro Marini and Fernando Henrique Cardoso and José Serra in the Revista Mexicana de Sociología. Breaking with the supposition that underdevelopment could be overcome only through social revolution, Cardoso and Serra embraced a perspective of long-term social transformation based on class alliances with fractions of the national bourgeoisie and international capital. This perspective was gradually weakened and finally abandoned in favor of full-fledged neoliberalism when Cardoso became president of Brazil in 1994, only to be resuscitated by so-called pink-tide administrations after 2002. O neodesenvolvimentismo surgiu no Brasil e na Argentina após a desmoralização do Consenso de Washington. Embora seus proponentes intelectuais o coloquem dentro da longa tradição do desenvolvimentismo latino-americano, uma importante origem teórica do neodesenvolvimentismo - a teoria da dependência - até agora foi ignorado. O termo apareceu pela primeira vez em 1978 como um palavrão na polêmica acalorada entre Ruy Mauro Marini e Fernando Henrique Cardoso e José Serra na Revista Mexicana de Sociología. Rompendo com a suposição de que o subdesenvolvimento só poderia ser superado por meio da revolução social, Cardoso e Serra abraçaram uma perspectiva de transformação social de longo prazo baseada em alianças de classe com frações da burguesia nacional e do capital internacional. Essa perspectiva foi gradualmente enfraquecida e finalmente abandonada em favor do neoliberalismo completo quando Cardoso se tornou presidente do Brasil em 1994, apenas para ser ressuscitada por administrações da chamada maré rosa após 2002.

show abstract

Section: : the Political Birth Of Neodevelopmentalismmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lost and Found: Bourgeois Dependency Theory and the Forgotten Roots of Neodevelopmentalism

Oliveira¹

2021

Latin American Perspectives

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

<b>PROSPECTS FOR DEWEYAN DEMOCRACY IN BRAZIL: THE OBSTACLES TO DEVELOPMENT IN THE SOCIO-POLITICAL DIMENSION</b><br/>PERSPECTIVAS DA DEMOCRACIA DE DEWEY NO BRASIL: OS OBSTÁCULOS AO DESENVOLVIMENTO NA DIMENSÃO SOCIO-POLÍTICA

Rego¹,

Kellogg

2020

2179-507X

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the present work is to discuss how democracy on Dewey's perspective could contribute to the development of countries like Brazil. In order to question this, we need first to understand the background discussion of development in the Latin American context. Therefore, we will present the course and main ideas about the development of the so-called “Dependency Theories” in the Latin American continent.

show abstract

Dependência: da teoria à prática

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Lost and Found: Bourgeois Dependency Theory and the Forgotten Roots of Neodevelopmentalism

Lost and Found: Bourgeois Dependency Theory and the Forgotten Roots of Neodevelopmentalism

<b>PROSPECTS FOR DEWEYAN DEMOCRACY IN BRAZIL: THE OBSTACLES TO DEVELOPMENT IN THE SOCIO-POLITICAL DIMENSION</b><br/>PERSPECTIVAS DA DEMOCRACIA DE DEWEY NO BRASIL: OS OBSTÁCULOS AO DESENVOLVIMENTO NA DIMENSÃO SOCIO-POLÍTICA

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About