2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-166x2013000100008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity of G-36 and knowledge tests in relation to performance at a training program

Abstract: This study aimed to investigate the predictive validity of academic grades and G-36 scores in personnel selection. The sample was compose by 83 individuals from public organization with mean age of 22.01 (SD=2.99) years old, being 81.9% males and 91.6% with eleven years of education (High School at least). Pearson correlation and regression analysis were used to verify the association between training performance and both predictors. Significant correlations were observed between variables range. Linear regres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ao fi nal, 11 medidas foram utilizadas. A descrição detalhada dos procedimentos realizados a respeito da AFE está disponível em A. G. Vasconcelos (2010;A. G. Vasconcelos, Nascimento, & Sampaio, 2011).…”
Section: Procedimentos De Análise Dos Dadosunclassified
“…Ao fi nal, 11 medidas foram utilizadas. A descrição detalhada dos procedimentos realizados a respeito da AFE está disponível em A. G. Vasconcelos (2010;A. G. Vasconcelos, Nascimento, & Sampaio, 2011).…”
Section: Procedimentos De Análise Dos Dadosunclassified
“…These actions are strategies adopted by organizations or institutions to maintain the quality of the service offered by investing in the training of personnel and development of Knowledge, Skill, and Attitude (KSA) compatible with their goals. It is worth mentioning the importance of choosing the appropriate prediction and criteria measures to assess performance and skills in the workplace (Vasconcelos, Sampaio, & Nascimento, 2013), as well as measures and variables that influence different forms of learning in organizations (Lopes & Mourão, 2010;Noe, Clarke, & Klein, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%