1999
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-88391999000400017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Renda familiar e mercado de trabalho: um balanço da década

Abstract: A RENDA FAMILIAR E MERCADO DE TRABALHO um balanço da décadapersistência e a gravidade dos problemas sociais vivenciados na sociedade brasileira e a exigüidade dos recursos públicos disponíveis para encaminhar so-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, in line with the results presented by Delgado and Cardoso Junior (2000) and Dini, Jannuzzi, Ferreira and Arizono (1999), the empirical evidence in this study shows that social security does not significantly affect the income of class C households. One possible explanation for this result is that labor income tends to be higher than social security income in these households (Dini et al, 1999), particularly as a result of the ceiling imposed by the RGPS. Therefore, the replacement of labor income by retirement and pensions in class C households would lead to a reduction in household income.…”
Section: Estimation and Discussion Of Propensity Scoresupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, in line with the results presented by Delgado and Cardoso Junior (2000) and Dini, Jannuzzi, Ferreira and Arizono (1999), the empirical evidence in this study shows that social security does not significantly affect the income of class C households. One possible explanation for this result is that labor income tends to be higher than social security income in these households (Dini et al, 1999), particularly as a result of the ceiling imposed by the RGPS. Therefore, the replacement of labor income by retirement and pensions in class C households would lead to a reduction in household income.…”
Section: Estimation and Discussion Of Propensity Scoresupporting
confidence: 92%