2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-86502012001200014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Abstract: PURPOSE:To check the rate of sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification in patients with locally advanced breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy comparing intraoperative contact cytology (imprint) and embedded in paraffin and validation of methods. METHODS: A cross-sectional validation of diagnostic test involving 34 patients from the outpatient clinic of the Maternity School Assis Chateaubriand. The patients had locally advanced breast cancer and were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Those w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our hospital, we only have blue dye (patent blue) available, and we conducted this cross-sectional study to demonstrate the detection rate of SLN using it to reflect a real-world evidence. Our SLN detection rate was of 85.3%, which would be acceptable, comparing with National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-27, with identification and removal of a sentinel lymph node of 84.8%, SENTINA arm C (80.1%), ACOSOG 1071 (92.7%), and Aguiar (85.3%) [5][6][7][8]18 . Although it would be possible to calculate FNR in our study (25%), the small sample size might overestimate this rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In our hospital, we only have blue dye (patent blue) available, and we conducted this cross-sectional study to demonstrate the detection rate of SLN using it to reflect a real-world evidence. Our SLN detection rate was of 85.3%, which would be acceptable, comparing with National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-27, with identification and removal of a sentinel lymph node of 84.8%, SENTINA arm C (80.1%), ACOSOG 1071 (92.7%), and Aguiar (85.3%) [5][6][7][8]18 . Although it would be possible to calculate FNR in our study (25%), the small sample size might overestimate this rate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Another study comparing imprint cytology with the histological analysis of SLNs from patients with locally advanced breast cancer subjected to neoadjuvant chemotherapy concluded that imprint cytology could not be recommended given the high rate of false negatives (12.01%) observed in the study. Therefore, further studies are required to validate the method 26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common descriptions brought together pro/retrospective with population origin (cohort/case-control/consecutive patients), and pro/retrospective with crosssectional, and pro/retrospective with number of centres, with 6 shorthand descriptions each. The longest descriptions were "a cross-sectional validation of diagnostic test" 24 and "cross-sectional, multicentre, non-interventional study" 25 . Both studies clearly indicated their purpose to be to measure diagnostic accuracy.…”
Section: Shorthand Descriptions Of Study Design -First Review Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%