Problematising the Ultimate Other of Modernity: the Crystallisation of Coloniality in International Politics

Abstract

This article examines a key element of the power relations underpinning international politics, namely coloniality. It delineates the coloniality of international politics, and elucidates the fundamental aspects of its operationalisation on the one hand, and its crystallisation into international politics on the other. The article is structured into three sections. First, it explores the meaning of coloniality, and outlines its fundamental characteristics. Next, it delineates a crucial operative element of coloniality, the idea of race, and the double movement through which coloniality is rendered operational – the colonisation of time and space. Finally, the article analyses two structuring problematisations that were fundamental to the crystallisation of coloniality in international politics – the work of Francisco de Vitoria, and the Valladolid Debate. It argues that the way in which these problematisations framed the relationship between the European Self and the ultimate Other of Western modernity – the indigenous peoples in the Americas – crystallised the pervasive role of coloniality in international politics.

A “New Middle East” Following 9/11 and the “Arab Spring” of 2011?—(Neo)-Orientalist Imaginaries Rejuvenate the (Temporal) Inclusive Exclusion Character of Jus Gentium

“…Since IR and IL are disciplines born out of a ratiocinative psyche reifying Latin-European philosophical theology, then it follows that "modern" relations amongst recognized sovereigns are structured around a spatial and temporal imagination casting cultures different to the "West" using a zero-sum game frame naturalizing "cultural competition" (Inayatullah and Blaney 2004;Blanco and Delgado 2019). Inayatullah and Blaney caution about the unethical consequences of competition being a naturalized disciplinary trait accenting global relations when encountering different cultures by emphasizing that it "fails to untangle the cultural logic of competition itself.…”

Indigenous Peoples and International Law in the Ecuadorian Amazon

“…Even before the independence of the Spanish colonies, the Indigenous peoples of Abya Yala were regarded as being under the jurisdiction of "international" law; indeed, "international" law had been created precisely to justify the conquest and colonization of the Americas by Europeans in the early sixteenth century (Blanco and Delgado 2019). Once it had been established by the Catholic juridical theorists that Amerindians were to be considered humans capable of rational thought, international law, which they did not play a part in constructing, could be applied to them, regardless of their beliefs and customs.…”

A Colonialidade Da Paz: (Re) Pensando O Processo De Paz Na Colômbia (2012-2016) a Partir Das Lutas Indígenas Por Participação

“…Com efeito, levamos a busca por essa abordagem ao debate no 4º Seminário de Relações Internacionais da Associação Brasileira de Relações Internacionais (ABRI), em uma discussão teórica a respeito especificamente das operações de peacebuilding da Organização das Nações Unidas. Na ocasião:121 Nesse sentido, os apontamentos críticos levantados porBlanco (2010) eSabaratnam (…”