2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-79722008000300010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desempenho de pessoas com autismo em tarefas de emparelhamento com o modelo por identidade: efeitos da organização dos estímulos

Abstract: ResumoO estudo avaliou o desempenho de 20 pessoas com autismo em uma tarefa de emparelhamento por identidade sob dois procedimentos que diferiram quanto à forma de apresentação dos estímulos e à resposta de escolha. No procedimento de matching típico cada tentativa apresentava um estímulo modelo e três de comparação; no matching adaptado três modelos e três estímulos de comparação eram apresentados simultaneamente. O procedimento foi conduzido em três blocos: 10 tentativas de matching adaptado, 10 de matching … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
13
2
8

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(44 reference statements)
5
13
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the difficulty of learning arbitrary relations for people diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders, widely indicated in the literature (Dube & McIlvane, 1995;Eikeseth & Smith, 1992;Gomes & de Souza, 2008;Gomes, Varella, & de Souza, 2010;Kelly, Green, & Sidman, 1998;Vause, Martin, Yu, Marion, & Sakko, 2005;Williams, Pérez-González, & Queiroz, 2005), was not confirmed by this study, considering the data from the EI group. These positive results can be attributed to the set of conditions prepared in the procedure, all recommended by studies on teaching by exclusion trials, and the presence of important repertoires for the performance of the proposed tasks in the participants.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Furthermore, the difficulty of learning arbitrary relations for people diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders, widely indicated in the literature (Dube & McIlvane, 1995;Eikeseth & Smith, 1992;Gomes & de Souza, 2008;Gomes, Varella, & de Souza, 2010;Kelly, Green, & Sidman, 1998;Vause, Martin, Yu, Marion, & Sakko, 2005;Williams, Pérez-González, & Queiroz, 2005), was not confirmed by this study, considering the data from the EI group. These positive results can be attributed to the set of conditions prepared in the procedure, all recommended by studies on teaching by exclusion trials, and the presence of important repertoires for the performance of the proposed tasks in the participants.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Alternativas ao MTS típico têm sido investigadas com populações com necessidades especiais (Serna, Dube, & McIlvane, 1997;Stromer, McIlvane, Dube, & Mackay, 1993;Stromer, McIlvane, & Serna, 1993), entre elas o uso do emparelhamento multimodelo ou MTS adaptado (Gomes & de Souza, 2008;TEACCH, 1992) com pessoas com autismo. O MTS adaptado multimodelo apresenta, a cada tentativa, um estímulo modelo composto de tantos elementos quanto o número de estímulos de comparação e a tarefa do aprendiz é relacionar cada comparação ao seu respectivo elemento, componente do modelo composto.…”
unclassified
“…For identity relations, in the presence of each sample stimulus, selecting the stimulus among other available alternatives (comparison stimuli) that presents similar physical characteristics to the sample is correlated to reinforcement (Albuquerque & Melo 2005;Stromer & Stromer, 1989). Visual organization of matching-to-sample tasks have been pointed out as a variable that affects participants' performance (Gomes, 2011;Gomes & de Souza, 2008;Mesibov, Schopler, & Hearsey, 1994). Gomes and Souza (2008) compared the performance of 20 individuals with (mild/moderate and severe) ASD in two identity matching procedures that differed in visual presentation of stimuli.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual organization of matching-to-sample tasks have been pointed out as a variable that affects participants' performance (Gomes, 2011;Gomes & de Souza, 2008;Mesibov, Schopler, & Hearsey, 1994). Gomes and Souza (2008) compared the performance of 20 individuals with (mild/moderate and severe) ASD in two identity matching procedures that differed in visual presentation of stimuli. Trials from each task were presented in a binder with dividers (pages), in which cards with stimuli were inserted (familiar fi gures, words, letter sequences or abstract stimuli).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%