2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-76382009000200004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O sexteto mágico da pesquisa clínica

Abstract: This article approaches some general guidelines for evaluating clinical research (design, execution and reporting), including the initial research "idea" (or question to be answered), "hypothesis and objective" which should be aligned with the "primary variable" to be investigated and the "conclusions" reached on the basis of the results of the study. One cannot forget that the study "title" should reflect the "idea" and relative "objective" of the study and the "conclusion", emphasizing the "Magic Sextet of R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…35 It has indicated certain avenues for further investigations in presenting a valid and trustworthy scale for use in vascular research and the AVVQ-Brazil (AVVQ-Br) should contribute to use of data expressed as a reference in future research to review the clinimetric properties of the AVVQ and to elucidate the correlations between QoL and C4 severity of CVD, in view of its relevance to researchers in the area and to society in general.…”
Section: Implications For Research and For Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 It has indicated certain avenues for further investigations in presenting a valid and trustworthy scale for use in vascular research and the AVVQ-Brazil (AVVQ-Br) should contribute to use of data expressed as a reference in future research to review the clinimetric properties of the AVVQ and to elucidate the correlations between QoL and C4 severity of CVD, in view of its relevance to researchers in the area and to society in general.…”
Section: Implications For Research and For Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodological idea for this study is based on the proposal of the "magic sextet" of research, which prescribes a direct and consecutive relationship between the stages of scientific publications, proposing the correct method for planning, execution and publication of research. 16 The current recommendation for quality of life assessment is that a disease-specific instrument should be used in combination with a generic instrument. 4 Since no venous ulcer instruments had yet been validated for use in Brazil, the CCVUQ was chosen, because it is a specific instrument that has importance, applicability and good psychometric properties demonstrated in previous studies that have successfully produced satisfactory versions in languages other than the original.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal consistency results were satisfactory, with Cronbach's alphas ranging from 0.7 to 0.95, which is similar to the original validation study 8 and to the results of validation of the Chinese version. 16 Overall, the fact that the correlations were reasonable, rather than excellent, has been explained by another study of quality of life in venous disease, which suggested that those factors to which the CCVUQ is sensitive are likely to be different from those to which the SF-36 is sensitive, since the generic instrument is less sensitive for assessing the effects of disease on the quality of life of individuals or populations with a specific pathology, 4 while the CCVUQ is less sensitive to disease in general.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os Fóruns das regionais da Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e de Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV) e o Workshop de Defesa Profissional sobre procedimentos médicos, diretrizes, Troca de Informações em Saúde Suplementar (TISS), Terminologia Unificada de Saúde Suplementar (TUSS) 1 e resolução do Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM) sobre auditoria médica e novo Código de Ética Médica concluíram ser importante, para nossa especialidade, a implantação da Classificação Brasileira Hierarquizada de Procedimentos Médicos (CBHPM) 2 . As razões são as seguintes: 1. a CBHPM representa o parâmetro mínimo de remuneração dos honorários médicos recomendado pelo CFM 3 e estabelecido pela Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB), representando um grande avanço no sentido da valorização da atividade médica; 2. a Agência Nacional de Saúde (ANS) 1 adotou o padrão de códigos da CBHPM para a saúde suplementar (convênios, cooperativas, seguro saúde e planos de saúde privados), ou seja, as operadoras de planos de saúde privados terão de adotar o TUSS 1 como referência, incorporando mais de 80% dos códigos da CBHPM quinta edição; 3. os valores de honorários praticados nos procedimentos serão oportunamente negociados por uma comissão mista (AMB, CFM e sociedades) com as operadoras de plano privado de saúde, tendo como base a CBHPM; não é mais considerado como cartel utilizar a CBHPM como parâmetro para atuação na saúde suplementar, de acordo com a decisão da quinta vara do Tribunal Federal de Justiça 4 ; 4. as diretrizes da AMB/SBACV são muito importantes para a pesquisa 5,6 e para o apoio às decisões de procedimentos que são propostos e colocados na CBHPM quinta edição.…”
unclassified