“…The outcome assessor was described as blinded for at least some of the outcomes assessed in three papers, but it is unclear how this was achieved and whether it was effective (Gregoretti et al, ; Rayburn, Gonzalez, Christensen, Harkins, et al, ; M. L. Vieira, Hamada, et al, ). Automated recording techniques reduced bias in some assessments, such as the photoelectric monitoring of activity in the hole board test (V. A. Vieira, Campos, et al, ). Rates of attrition among the rodents were clearly described by M. L. Vieira, Hamada, et al (), Rayburn et al (), and Rayburn, Gonzalez, Christensen, and Stewart (), but this aspect was unclear in the remaining trials.…”