2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-69092010000300001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lusotopia como Ecumene

Abstract: * na escrita deste ensaio estou especificamente endividado a Mónica Chan, omar ribeiro thomaz, Michel Cahen, Hermínio Martins, Wilson trajano Filho, rui graça Feijó, Cristiana Bastos por me ter chamado a atenção para a obra de Ulf Hannerz há muitos anos atrás, e a Luiz Fernando Dias Duarte pelas suas valiosas críticas. nenhum deles, porém, poderá ser responsabilizado pela tosca forma que decidi dar ao argumento.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study(Lobner, 2020) we found three ideal types of ecumene: creolization (the Caribbean)(Mintz, 1996), amity (Lusotopy)(Pina-Cabral, 2010), global lineages (the Timorese space). These are based on the ecumene framework of Sidney Mintz, Ulf Hannerz, Pina-Cabral and our own research outputs.Paulo Castro Seixas, Nuno Canas Mendes, and Nadine Lobner -9789004522923 Downloaded from Brill.com03/27/2023 02:57:24AM via free access…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In a previous study(Lobner, 2020) we found three ideal types of ecumene: creolization (the Caribbean)(Mintz, 1996), amity (Lusotopy)(Pina-Cabral, 2010), global lineages (the Timorese space). These are based on the ecumene framework of Sidney Mintz, Ulf Hannerz, Pina-Cabral and our own research outputs.Paulo Castro Seixas, Nuno Canas Mendes, and Nadine Lobner -9789004522923 Downloaded from Brill.com03/27/2023 02:57:24AM via free access…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…We believe that there are many ecumene in this construction, which need to be understood in their multiple dimensions. In many cases it is assumed that ecumene are based on multilateralism (Hannerz, 1989;Mintz, 1996;Pina-Cabral, 2010). Yet, we propose that this does not always need to be the case, specifically when we consider China and its open bilateralism standard.…”
Section: Comparative Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%