2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2012000700009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1) for diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder according to DSM-IV criteria

Abstract: The objective was to study the accuracy of the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) section of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI 2.1) DSM-IV diagnosis, using the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID) as gold standard, and compare the ICD-10 and DSM IV classifications for PTSD. The CIDI was applied by trained lay interviewers and the SCID by a psychologist. The subjects were selected from a community and an outpatient program. A total of 67 subjects completed both assessments. Kappa coeffic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The validated Brazilian version of the instrument “Composite International Diagnostic Interview” (CIDI), version 2.1, was used for diagnosis of psychiatric disorders [7] [8] [11]. CIDI is a standard structured questionnaire, designed to be used by trained non-clinician interviewers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The validated Brazilian version of the instrument “Composite International Diagnostic Interview” (CIDI), version 2.1, was used for diagnosis of psychiatric disorders [7] [8] [11]. CIDI is a standard structured questionnaire, designed to be used by trained non-clinician interviewers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CIDI was applied by law interviewers trained and supervised by trainers from CIDI Brazil Official Center. The Portuguese version of the CIDI 2.1 has been previously validated and adapted to Brazil’s social and cultural context [7], [10], [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure to a traumatic experience was assessed through a list of 32 events: 11 from the CIDI 2.1 [20] and 21 added by the authors [21], [22]. These additional events concerned episodes or situations effectively identifiable in the study domain.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These additional events concerned episodes or situations effectively identifiable in the study domain. Some related to exposure to assaultive violence or other shocking events (e.g., being attacked with or without a weapon, death threats, having house broken in, experiencing parental and/or intimate partner violence), while others had to do with grief and suffering (e.g., sudden death or life-threatening illness of a close relative/person, car/motorcycle accident) [21], [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 12-month version was used. The CIDI has demonstrated good psychometric properties (Andrews & Peters, 1998; Breslau, Kessler, & Peterson, 1998; Quintana, Mari Jde, Ribeiro, Jorge, & Andreoli, 2012). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%