2011
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2011000700004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desempenho do exame citológico e da captura híbrida II no rastreamento de lesões intraepiteliais escamosas de alto grau em mulheres HIV+

Abstract: HIV-infected women are at increased risk of developing high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), IntroduçãoO câncer do colo do útero é a segunda neoplasia mais frequente entre mulheres 1 . O papiloma vírus humano (HPV) do tipo oncogênico é uma causa necessária para o desenvolvimento do câncer do colo do útero 2,3,4 . As lesões intraepiteliais escamosas de alto grau (high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions -HSIL) são atipias do epitélio cervical precursoras do câncer do colo do útero que podem ser… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For women in general, some meta-analysis studies estimated that the sensitivity of cytological approaches 55% [3] [33] 34]. As in this study, which found a sensitivity of 31.8% and specificity of 95.5%, Fox and colleagues also found low sensitivity and high specificity of cytology studying HIV-infected women in Rio de Janeiro [32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For women in general, some meta-analysis studies estimated that the sensitivity of cytological approaches 55% [3] [33] 34]. As in this study, which found a sensitivity of 31.8% and specificity of 95.5%, Fox and colleagues also found low sensitivity and high specificity of cytology studying HIV-infected women in Rio de Janeiro [32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…This is important, because in the literature, estimates of sensitivity and specificity of cervical cytology in women generally have different results [3] [30] [31] [32]. For women in general, some meta-analysis studies estimated that the sensitivity of cytological approaches 55% [3] [33] 34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%