2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352009000600034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxa de infestação por ácaro Varroa destructor em apiários sob georreferenciamento

Abstract: Taxa de infestação por ácaro Varroa destructor em apiários sob georreferenciamento [Rate of infestation by Varroa destructor in apiaries under geoprocessing]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the high variation in infestation rates between the regions evaluated (Table 1), the values were lower than those found in European honey bees during summer/spring without acaricide treatment: Bulgaria, 18-49% (Kanchev et al, 1989); southern England, 15-40% (Martin, 1994); and the United Kingdom, 6-42% (Martin, 2001). However, closer values were found when comparing the results obtained in other southeast regions of Brazil: 3.3-11% in the Mata Mineira zone, Minas Gerais state (Bacha-Júnior et al, 2009); 1.1 to 11.6% and 5.0 to 14.0% in the Vale do Ribeira region, São Paulo state (Pinto et al, 2011 andGuimarães-Cestaro et al, 2017a, respectively); 2.83 to 9.48% in the centraleastern region of São Paulo state (Guimarães-Cestaro et al, 2017b) and 7.2 % ± 3.3% in southeastern region of the country (Peixoto et al, 2021). Although the levels of infestation were generally low, they were high in some southern regions, such as the states of Paraná (19.6±13.2 and 20.0±8.0) and Santa Catarina (17.0±5.5 and 17.6±10.0) (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Despite the high variation in infestation rates between the regions evaluated (Table 1), the values were lower than those found in European honey bees during summer/spring without acaricide treatment: Bulgaria, 18-49% (Kanchev et al, 1989); southern England, 15-40% (Martin, 1994); and the United Kingdom, 6-42% (Martin, 2001). However, closer values were found when comparing the results obtained in other southeast regions of Brazil: 3.3-11% in the Mata Mineira zone, Minas Gerais state (Bacha-Júnior et al, 2009); 1.1 to 11.6% and 5.0 to 14.0% in the Vale do Ribeira region, São Paulo state (Pinto et al, 2011 andGuimarães-Cestaro et al, 2017a, respectively); 2.83 to 9.48% in the centraleastern region of São Paulo state (Guimarães-Cestaro et al, 2017b) and 7.2 % ± 3.3% in southeastern region of the country (Peixoto et al, 2021). Although the levels of infestation were generally low, they were high in some southern regions, such as the states of Paraná (19.6±13.2 and 20.0±8.0) and Santa Catarina (17.0±5.5 and 17.6±10.0) (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, there is the need of further research to verify the current situation of the predominant haplotypes in the region. (Bacha Júnior et al, 2009). These authors warned of a possible influence of the abundance of beehives on the dynamics of mite infestation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brito (2010), afirma que a identificação georreferenciada permite a edição de banco de dados geográficos que oferecem aportes para a certificação de produtos orgânicos e identificação de produtores aptos de inserção nas redes de comércio justo e solidário. Bacha Júnior et al (2009), corroboram a ideia de possibilitar a análise de áreas com sobreposições de enxames, constatar e monitorar pragas e doenças e futuramente permitir o uso no acompanhamento de culturas que utilizem agrotóxicos demonstrando condições de risco tanto para as abelhas quanto para o ser humano devido o consumo de produtos contaminados.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified