2020
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-053620200212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cowpea and beet intercropping agro-economic dynamics under spatial arrangement and cowpea population density

Abstract: ABSTRACT The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of planting spatial arrangements between the cowpea and beet crops in intercropping and of cowpea population densities on the crop’s productivity and in the agro-economic efficiency of the association at two growing seasons. The experimental design was of randomised blocks with the treatments arranged in a 4 x 3 factorial scheme, in four replications. The first factor was constituted by three spatial arrangements between the component cultu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

7
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other factor of considerable relevance in the success of an intercropping system is the plant population, which directly influences the crops growing and development and system's productivity, through intraspecific and interspecific competition for environmental resources (Chaves et al, 2020). Studies on plant populations in crop associations are generally designed in part to improve system productivity and provide a rationalization of necessary crop treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other factor of considerable relevance in the success of an intercropping system is the plant population, which directly influences the crops growing and development and system's productivity, through intraspecific and interspecific competition for environmental resources (Chaves et al, 2020). Studies on plant populations in crop associations are generally designed in part to improve system productivity and provide a rationalization of necessary crop treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the intercropping systems, it is important to know the economic value of the system and the profit it can give producers. The monetary equivalent ratio is an indicator of economic feasibility of the intercropped systems and shows if they are advantageous (Chaves et al, 2020). In this study, monetary equivalent ratio values were higher than 1, evidencing monetary advantage of the intercrops coming from cowpea and beet cultivar combinations in relation to their best monocrops, indicating that the intercropped system with the best use of growth resources can translate into economic advantage.…”
Section: Agro-economic Performance Of Cowpea-beet Cultivar Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This is probably related to the absence of interspecific competition over the natural resources of the environment. However, in intercropping cultivation, the presence of interspecific competition may, depending on the crops, decrease their respective productivities due to the high competition for soil nutrients and a decrease in the efficiency of plants to the available nutrients (Chaves et al, 2020). On the other hand, for cropping years within each cropping system, the first year stood out from the second one in the monocropping in the productivity of green pods, while the second one stood out from the first one in the intercropping (Table 1).…”
Section: Cowpea Productive Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cowpea and radish are two companion crops of economic and nutritional value that can complement each other in an intercropping system because they have different plant architectures and root systems (Pereira et al, 2016;Chaves et al, 2020). Thus, an intercropping system between these crops has been recognized as a potentially beneficial system of agricultural production, as it increases the total yield of crops per unit of land per unit of time, as well as it increases the diversity of products, reduces the economic risks of the producer, and helps to efficiently and judiciously use the land, labor, and other environmental resources of the rural land (Nunes et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%