Catálogo bibliográfico dos taxa superiores da ordem Lepidoptera

Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik

doi:10.1590/s0101-81752006000100001

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It turns out, however, that the name goes back to Haeckel's (1889) paper where Sorbentia consisted of nothing but Lepidoptera, whereas the caddisflies (under the generic name Phryganea within Neuroptera) were treated separately among Mordentia. Thus, the name SORBENTIA Haeckel, 1889 is a junior circumscriptional synonym of Lepidoptera (Mielke & Casagrande 2006). The oldest circumscriptional name for Lepidoptera + Trichoptera is not Sorbentia, but AMPHIESMENOPTERA Kiriakoff, 1948. Some modern workers treat the name GLOSSATA Fabricius, 1775 not as a synonym of Lepidoptera but as a valid name of a taxon that does not include the laciniate moths (Micropterigidae).…”

Section: Lepidoptera Linnaeus 1758mentioning

confidence: 99%

Circumscriptional names of higher taxa in Hexapoda

Kluge¹

2010

Bionomina

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Testing non-typified names by applying rules of circumscriptional nomenclature shows that in most cases the traditional usage can be supported. However, the original circumscription of several widely used non-typified names does not fit the taxa they are applied to. Here I discuss names historically applied to the taxa whose correct circumscriptional names should be Hexapoda, Amyocerata, Triplura, Dermatoptera, Saltatoria, Spectra, Pandictyoptera, Palaeoblattariae, Neoblattariae, Parametabola, Parasita, Arthroidignatha, Plantisuga, Metabola, Birostrata, Rhaphidioptera, Meganeuroptera, Eleuterata, Panzygothoraca, Lepidoptera and Glossolepidoptera. The new names Holopandictyoptera taxon nov., Cryptovipositoria taxon nov., Oothecophora taxon nov., Enteracantha taxon nov., and Pleuroptera taxon nov. are proposed for recognized but yet unnamed taxa.

show abstract

Section: Lepidoptera Linnaeus 1758mentioning

confidence: 99%

Circumscriptional names of higher taxa in Hexapoda

Kluge¹

2010

Bionomina

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The genus Caligo Hübner, [1819] (Satyrinae, Brassolina) has 21 species, all of large size (over 100 mm in wingspan), the majority of twilight habit and gregarious larvae in the initial stages (Penz et al, 1999;Casagrande and Mielke, 2000;Casagrande, 2002). Most studies with these species were on systematic (Wahlberg et al, 2003;Freitas and Brown, 2004;Mielke and Casagrande, 2006;Penz, 2007) and morphology (Souza et al, 2006;Casagrande and Mielke, 2008).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Biological aspects of Caligo teucer (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) with banana tree leaves

Zanúncio

Silva

Martínez

et al. 2021

Rev. Bras. entomol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Caligo teucer (Linnaeus, 1758) is widely distributed in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil and Ecuador. The objective was to study biological aspects of Caligo teucer japetus Stichel, 1903 with banana leaves, Musa sapientium L. (Zingiberales: Musaceae), in the butterfly garden, under environmental conditions, and in the laboratory of biological control of insects at the Universidade Federal de Viçosa in Viçosa, Minas Gerais state, Brazil at 24 ± 2 o C, 68 ± 10% relative humidity and 12 hours photophase. The duration of the egg incubation, larvae, pupa and egg to adult periods of C. teucer japetus were, respectively, 11.8 ± 0.1; 53.9 ± 0.9; 17.9 ± 0.3 and 82.6 ± 1.0 days for females, and 11.8 ± 0.1; 50.3 ± 0.6; 18.4 ± 0.3 and 79.4 ± 0.6 days for males in cages in the laboratory. The longevity of C. teucer japetus adults was 26.0 ± 10.4 and 47.5 ± 8.7 for females and 24.7 ± 3.5 and 35.4 ± 15.7 for males in the butterfly garden and in laboratory cages, respectively. The high survival and the relatively short period of development of its immature stages confirm that banana leaves are an adequate food substrate for the development and survival of Caligo teucer japetus.

show abstract

“…Butterflies are very sensitive to changes in temperature, humidity and solar radiation produced by disturbances to their habitat; inventories of their communities measuring their diversity, richness and chorological aspects therefore constitute a valid instrument for assessing their state of conservation and/or changes to the natural environment [10]. Due to their abundance, diversity, ease of handling in the field, spatial and temporal stability, and in general because their taxonomy is well documented, they are used as appropriate ecological indicators [10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Due to their abundance, diversity, ease of handling in the field, spatial and temporal stability, and in general because their taxonomy is well documented, they are used as appropriate ecological indicators [10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Taxocenotic and Biocenotic Study of Lepidoptera (Rhopalocera) in Rucamanque: A Forest Remnant in the Central Valley of the Araucanía Region, Chile

Parra¹,

Ranz²

2017

Lepidoptera

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Considering that butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) are sensitive to physical and climatic changes, e.g. of temperature, humidity and solar radiation, produced by disturbances in their habitat, a survey of this group was carried out in a small remnant of native forest (Rucamanque) in the centra lv a ll eyoftheAr auca níaReg ionofChil e. The object was to record the composition, abundance and diversity of Rhopalocera in grassland, forest and the ecotone between them during spring and summer. The study recorded 1190 individual butterflies belonging to 25 species, 18 genera, 8 sub-families and 4 families. The highest values of species richness and abundance were obtained in the summer, of 25 species and 953 individuals; in the spring, 9 species were recorded with a total of 237 individuals. The greatest diversity and homogeneity were found in the ecotone habitat (H 0 =3.86; J 0 =0.88; λ =0.08); the values for grassland were (H 0 =2.73; J 0 =0.67; λ =0.23) and for forest (H 0 =2.55; J 0 =0.71; λ =0.23); these environments being less diverse and more homogeneous. The greatest taxocenotic similarity was found between grassland and the ecotone (54%), and the least similarity appeared between the ecotone and forest (34%). The greatest biocenotic similarity was found between the ecotone and forest (48%), and the lowest correspondence was between grassland and forest (4.18%).

show abstract

Catálogo bibliográfico dos taxa superiores da ordem Lepidoptera

Abstract: 192, 200, 201,[203][204][205][206][207] 211, 213, 214,[541][542][543][544][545][546][547][548] 550, 555, 557, 558, pl. 6 (filogenia) , p. 201, 202, 203, 204, 216.-Bode, 1907

Cited by 4 publications

References 1 publication

Circumscriptional names of higher taxa in Hexapoda

Circumscriptional names of higher taxa in Hexapoda

Biological aspects of Caligo teucer (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) with banana tree leaves

Taxocenotic and Biocenotic Study of Lepidoptera (Rhopalocera) in Rucamanque: A Forest Remnant in the Central Valley of the Araucanía Region, Chile

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About