2010
DOI: 10.11646/bionomina.1.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Circumscriptional names of higher taxa in Hexapoda

Abstract: Testing non-typified names by applying rules of circumscriptional nomenclature shows that in most cases the traditional usage can be supported. However, the original circumscription of several widely used non-typified names does not fit the taxa they are applied to. Here I discuss names historically applied to the taxa whose correct circumscriptional names should be Hexapoda, Amyocerata, Triplura, Dermatoptera, Saltatoria, Spectra, Pandictyoptera, Palaeoblattariae, Neoblattariae, Parametabola, Parasita, Arthro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an "Achilles heel" of modern nomenclature. Multiple efforts were done towards a resolving of higher taxa problem, rule-or database-based (Reveal 2008;Shipunov 2009;Kluge, 2010 and his earlier Russian publications; Dubois, 2011a and his other publications) but the current Codes still almost completely ignore the problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an "Achilles heel" of modern nomenclature. Multiple efforts were done towards a resolving of higher taxa problem, rule-or database-based (Reveal 2008;Shipunov 2009;Kluge, 2010 and his earlier Russian publications; Dubois, 2011a and his other publications) but the current Codes still almost completely ignore the problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, I have developed a rank-free nomenclature or, to be more precise, a dual nomenclature system which allows an unlimited number of taxa distributed over an unlimited number of hierarchical levels to be given monosemantic names that do not contradict either the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature or the traditional usage of higher-taxa names (Kluge, 1999a(Kluge, , 1999b(Kluge, , 2000(Kluge, , 2009a(Kluge, , 2010c. This nomenclature was successfully used in practice: in particular, during full-scale revision of the phylogenetic system of Ephemeroptera (Kluge, 2004a(Kluge, , 2007a(Kluge, , 2007b(Kluge, , 2008(Kluge, , 2009(Kluge, , 2010a(Kluge, , 2010bKluge and Novikova, 2011).…”
Section: The Principles Of Cladoendesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…designates here the typified rank-free hierarchical name (nomen hierarchicum) of the same taxon for which the non-typified rank-free circumscriptional name (nomen circumscribens) is provided. The statuses of the names used in this classification were discussed earlier (Kluge, 2010c(Kluge, , 2010d.…”
Section: Cladoendesis and The Study Of Metamorphosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations