1995
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-81751995000400027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Três espécies novas de Dasineura Rondani (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) associadas a Myrtaceae na Restinga da Barra de Maricá, Rio de Janeiro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In D. gigantea Angelo & Maia, the gonostylus is setose dorsally on its basal third (Angelo and Maia 1999), as in the two species from Leptospermum, whereas in D. marginalis Maia it is setose almost to its tip (Maia et al 2005). Differences are also found in the shape of the aedeagus, which is narrow and rounded apically in D. gigantea and D. marginalis Maia but truncated and notched in D. myrciariae Maia (Maia 1995). Good differences are found in the shape of the pupal antennal bases, which are barely developed in D. strobila, bear tiny pointed projections in D. myrciariae, D. tavaresi Maia (Maia 1995) and D. tomentosa, developed into small tapered horns in D. globosa Maia and D. marginalis (Maia 1995;Maia et al 2005), or form flat, slightly bi-lobed ridges in D. gigantea (Angelo and Maia 1999).…”
Section: General Taxonomic Commentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In D. gigantea Angelo & Maia, the gonostylus is setose dorsally on its basal third (Angelo and Maia 1999), as in the two species from Leptospermum, whereas in D. marginalis Maia it is setose almost to its tip (Maia et al 2005). Differences are also found in the shape of the aedeagus, which is narrow and rounded apically in D. gigantea and D. marginalis Maia but truncated and notched in D. myrciariae Maia (Maia 1995). Good differences are found in the shape of the pupal antennal bases, which are barely developed in D. strobila, bear tiny pointed projections in D. myrciariae, D. tavaresi Maia (Maia 1995) and D. tomentosa, developed into small tapered horns in D. globosa Maia and D. marginalis (Maia 1995;Maia et al 2005), or form flat, slightly bi-lobed ridges in D. gigantea (Angelo and Maia 1999).…”
Section: General Taxonomic Commentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Differences are also found in the shape of the aedeagus, which is narrow and rounded apically in D. gigantea and D. marginalis Maia but truncated and notched in D. myrciariae Maia (Maia 1995). Good differences are found in the shape of the pupal antennal bases, which are barely developed in D. strobila, bear tiny pointed projections in D. myrciariae, D. tavaresi Maia (Maia 1995) and D. tomentosa, developed into small tapered horns in D. globosa Maia and D. marginalis (Maia 1995;Maia et al 2005), or form flat, slightly bi-lobed ridges in D. gigantea (Angelo and Maia 1999). The number of terminal papillae in the larvae also vary among species, being eight in D. myricariae and D. tavaresi, but six in D. gigantea, D. strobila and D. tomentosa.…”
Section: General Taxonomic Commentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the Rio Grande do Sul State, there are five reported species of this genus (Marchiori & Sobral 1997). Three Cecidomyiidae species have been recorded as galls inducer on this plant genus: Dasineura myrciariae Maia 1996, Myrciariamyia bivalva Maia 1995and Myrciariamyia fernandesi Maia 2004; the first two species are associated with leaves of Myrciaria floribunda (H. West ex Willd.) O. Berg and the other species induce bud galls on Myrciaria tenella (DC.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O. Berg and the other species induce bud galls on Myrciaria tenella (DC.) O. Berg (Gagné 2010, Maia 1995a, 1996, 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although much is known about the ecology of some of the species of Cecidomyiidae, mainly from Europe and United States, the number of species (and even of genera) described in this family is still growing remarkably around the world, for example in Western Europe (e.g. Fedotova, 1994Fedotova, , 1993aFedotova, , 1993b, Brazil (Maia, 1995a(Maia, , 1995b(Maia, , 1993a(Maia, , 1993bMaia & Couri, 1993;Maia et al, 1996) and USA (Gagné & Bennett, 1993;Gagné & Strong, 1993). These works are essentially of taxonomic nature, and much more is needed to understand the ecology and evolution of this group as a whole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%