1988
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-81751988000200013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contribuição ao conhecimento de Thais mariae, Morretes, 1954 (Mollusca prosobranchia)

Abstract: O exame anatÔmico dos espécimes em nosso poder prontamente revelou uma grande diferença entre a genitália masculina de T. mariae e de T. haemastoma.Ainda estamos prosseguindo com o estudo da anatomia de T. mariae e das demais espécies do gênero que ocorrem nas costas brasileiras, com vistas a uma possrvel revisão sistemática desse grupo de prosobrãnquios. Acreditamos porém que é oportuno publicarmos alguns dos resultados que obtivemos até aqui, com respeito a T. mariae, para eliminar as dúvidas de muitos malac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data may be used therefore as a control sample for comparison with the mollusks present in the cores before and after the opening of the artificial channel. Data from Morretes (1954), Gerlach (1958), Tomassi (1970), Marini (1988), Flynn et al (1998), Jorcin (1999), de Oliveira et al (2006), Yamagata et al (2007), and Pereira et al (2003) were considered in this study. Unfortunately, in some papers there are neither descriptions nor illustrations of the taxa, and some identifications at the specific level are doubtful.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data may be used therefore as a control sample for comparison with the mollusks present in the cores before and after the opening of the artificial channel. Data from Morretes (1954), Gerlach (1958), Tomassi (1970), Marini (1988), Flynn et al (1998), Jorcin (1999), de Oliveira et al (2006), Yamagata et al (2007), and Pereira et al (2003) were considered in this study. Unfortunately, in some papers there are neither descriptions nor illustrations of the taxa, and some identifications at the specific level are doubtful.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%