1988
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-81751988000100006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caracteres merísticos e biologia do cascudo, Hypostomus fluviatilis (Schubart, 1964) (Osteichthyes, Loricariidae) do rio Mogi-Guaçu, São Paulo, Brasil

Abstract: Hypostomus fluviatilis (Schubart, 1964) é um cascudo (Loricariidae) achado no rio Mogi-Guaçu, Estado de São Paulo. É espécie que pode interessar alguns criadores de peixes, por sua excelente carne. Um total de 47 exemplares (26 machos e 21 fêmeas) foi analisado, capturado de março a setembro de 1975, em Emas, rio Mogi-Guaçu. Alguns caracteres merísticos e outros aspectos biológicos são fornecidos.
Hypostomus fluviatilis (Schubart, 1964) is an armoured catfish (Loricariidae) found in the Mogi-Guaçu river, St…
Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
3
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2021). Our work supports the pattern of larger body size in males for congeneric H. hermanni documented by Nomura and Mueller (1980) as well as the >100‐year‐old report by Miranda Ribeiro (1918) of enlarged fins in males of H. albopunctatus (Zawadzki et al. 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2021). Our work supports the pattern of larger body size in males for congeneric H. hermanni documented by Nomura and Mueller (1980) as well as the >100‐year‐old report by Miranda Ribeiro (1918) of enlarged fins in males of H. albopunctatus (Zawadzki et al. 2020).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Dimorphism within the genus Hypostomus is apparently uncommon given that studies have concluded a lack of sexual dimorphism for H. commersonii (Goulart and Verani 1992), H. affins and H. luetkeni (Mazzoni and Caramaschi 1995), H. velhochico (Zawadzki et al 2017), H. subcarinatus (Zawadzki et al 2019), and H. froehlichi (Zawadzki et al 2021). Our work supports the pattern of larger body size in males for congeneric H. hermanni documented by Nomura and Mueller (1980) as well as the >100-year-old report by Miranda Ribeiro (1918) of enlarged fins in males of H. albopunctatus (Zawadzki et al 2020). Differences in total body size may cause other morphometrics to increase in size due solely to correlation with total size; thus, it is common to calculate ratios of morphometric measures to total or standard length as we did in our study (Reis et al 2022).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…debemos tener presente que las especies de Curimatidae se caracterizan por un órgano epibranquial musculoso, en la parte media de la porción dorsal de los arcos branquiales, con una reducción o pérdida de dentición en la V placa faríngea y en los ceratobranquiales, y las mandíbulas en los adultos no poseen dientes (Vari, 1989b;Nelson, 2006). Esta caracterización morfológica las capacita para ser especies detritívoras (Froese & Pauly, 2013), que se alimentan específicamente de materia orgáni-ca floculada, microdetritus, micro vegetación, algas filamentosas y microcrustáceos (Nomura & Taveira, 1979;Nomura & Hayashi, 1980;Carvalho, 1984;Vari, 1989b;Vari, 1989c;Fernández, Pouilly, & Reja, 2011). La disponibilidad de estos alimentos sería una de las variables que podría estar induciendo estas diferencias, donde las especies que habitan ambientes lóticos tienden a ser euritróficas, con un gran consumo de material alóctono, aprovechando todo lo disponible (Escalante, 1987), lo que las constituye en especies oportunistas.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Both Iheringichthys labrosus (Lütken, 1874) and Pimelodus maculatus Lacépède, 1803 can be found among the native species of the Grande River. They belong to the order Siluriformes, family Pimelodidae, have common anatomical characteristics described by Lundberg & Littmann (2003) that are generally associated with benthic foraging habits (Nomura et al 1972, Fugi et al 1996, Abes et al 2001, Fugi et al 2001. I. labrosus has been classified as omnivorous, invertivorous or insectivorous species (Manetta et al 2003, Luz-Agostinho et al 2006, Fagundes et al 2008, Ribeiro et al 2014) and there is little information on its interaction with other species (Masdeu et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%