2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-41612008000200002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Avaliando resultados de um programa de transferência de renda: o impacto do Bolsa-Escola sobre os gastos das famílias brasileiras

Abstract: Resumo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
23

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
14
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of evidence as to the impact on learning outcomes might be due to the time of participation allowed in CCT studies as compared to American income transfer programmes. While best-controlled evaluations of CCTs have been constrained within less than two years of programme exposure, the studies in the US invariably report results of learning outcomes for a time of participation that is more than two years (generally three or more years (Ferreira, Leite and Litchfield, 2006;Soares et al, 2006;Oliveira et al, 2007;Osório et al, 2007;Haddad, 2008 The answer to that question relies on the hypothesis that educational opportunities and outcomes can directly improve as a result of reductions in poverty and inequality. Reimers (2000a) highlights that income inequality is strongly associated with educational inequality in LA.…”
Section: Towards the Research Justificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lack of evidence as to the impact on learning outcomes might be due to the time of participation allowed in CCT studies as compared to American income transfer programmes. While best-controlled evaluations of CCTs have been constrained within less than two years of programme exposure, the studies in the US invariably report results of learning outcomes for a time of participation that is more than two years (generally three or more years (Ferreira, Leite and Litchfield, 2006;Soares et al, 2006;Oliveira et al, 2007;Osório et al, 2007;Haddad, 2008 The answer to that question relies on the hypothesis that educational opportunities and outcomes can directly improve as a result of reductions in poverty and inequality. Reimers (2000a) highlights that income inequality is strongly associated with educational inequality in LA.…”
Section: Towards the Research Justificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it remains one of the least studied with respect to its impacts on the social development of children and families until very recently. Amongst the few papers that can be found on BF's effects, many have focused on economic effects related to poverty, income inequality, and consumption (Soares et al, 2006;Osório et al, 2007;Resende and Oliveira, 2007;Tavares, 2008;Lignani et al, 2011), and more recently on adults' participation in the labour market (Tavares, 2008;Foguel and Barros, 2010). Studies of the impacts of BF on child development, health, and nutritional status of children can also be found in the literature (Morris et al, 2004;Castiñeira, Nunes and Rungo, 2009;Reis, 2010;Lima, Rabito and Dias, 2011;Paes-Sousa, Santos and Miazak, 2011;Piperata et al, 2011).…”
Section: The Educational Impacts Of Bolsa Família: a Brief Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A amostra do presente estudo foi selecionada de forma não aleatória, seguindo os trabalhos desenvolvidos por Magalhães et al (2006), Resende & Oliveira (2008) De acordo com Duarte et al (2009), a aplicação desse método admite que sejam atendidas as pressuposições do balanceamento das características observáveis, isto é, a seleção da amostra exige que a participação no programa em análise independa dos resultados e seja condicional nas covariáveis; e da presença de um suporte comum para que não se compare o incomparável, o que ocasionaria viés na avaliação. Assim, para cada grupo de controle, há um de tratamento correspondente.…”
Section: áRea De Estudo Natureza Dos Dados E Tamanho Da Amostraunclassified
“…Além disso, este estudo também inova quanto ao método utilizado para atender aos objetivos propostos, já que se emprega Propensity Score Matching. Essa ferramenta analítica tem sido largamente empregada para avaliar o impacto de políticas públicas, como, por exemplo, PRO-NAF (Programa Nacional de Fortalecimento da Agricultura Familiar), elaborado por Magalhães et al (2006), Bolsa Escola, desenvolvido por Resende & Oliveira (2008), e Bolsa Família, realizado por Duarte et al (2009), porém não se encontraram estudos que adotassem esse método para avaliar o impacto da reforma agrária.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified