2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-41612008000100003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trade unions and the economic performance of brazilian establishments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In what seems to be the first study in Latin America, Menezes-Filho et al (2002) find that there is a negative but insignificant correlation between unionism and productivity growth in Brazil in the 1990s. However, when the authors allow for a non-linear relationship they find that at low union density levels, an increase in union density tends to increase the rate of productivity growth, but at a decreasing rate, just as Menezes-Filho et al (1998b) found with UK R&D intensity.…”
Section: Productivity Growthmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In what seems to be the first study in Latin America, Menezes-Filho et al (2002) find that there is a negative but insignificant correlation between unionism and productivity growth in Brazil in the 1990s. However, when the authors allow for a non-linear relationship they find that at low union density levels, an increase in union density tends to increase the rate of productivity growth, but at a decreasing rate, just as Menezes-Filho et al (1998b) found with UK R&D intensity.…”
Section: Productivity Growthmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We think that, in a sense, we could interpret our evidence by noting that Figure 5 seems to back up a pattern where Recife and Salvador (both in the Northeastern region), specially between a productivity range of 1,000-3,000, present higher monopsony power due to either existing higher labor market frictions (see Table 7 on page 91) or ceteris paribus the role of unions on these regions, the latter point having some support on papers by Amadeo (1994), Carneiro (1998), andMenezes-Filho, Chahad, Zylberstajn, &Pazello (2008). Although we offer new initial hints, we think we still lack a complete structural explanation on the regional productivity inequality in Brazil.…”
Section: Productivities Distributionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…4 Fairris (2006) finds, for Mexico, that unions have a possitive effect on productivity, but not profitability, which is possibly attributed to higher training rates. Menezes-Filho, et al (2005) finds that unions in the manufacturing sector in Brazil are correlated with lower levels of profitability and investment, but that some level of unionization could have a positive impact on productivity, particularly in larger in firms with profit sharing. Saavedra and Toledo (2005) finds evidence for Peru that union firms earn lower profits and have lower productivity, but that such effects are strongly related to the firm characteristics.…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 96%