2007
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-33002007000200019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A filosofia depois do fim da filosofia

Abstract: A convicção realista de que deve haver uma autoridade não-humana à qual os homens podem recorrer tem sido,por longo tempo,entremeada ao senso comum do Ocidente.É uma convicção comum a Sócrates e Lutero,a cientistas naturais ateus que dizem amar a verdade e fundamentalistas que dizem amar a Cristo. Acho que seria uma boa idéia reinventar a rede de crenças e desejos compartilhados que compõem a cultura ocidental com o objetivo de nos livrarmos dessa convicção. Richard Rorty,Philosophical papers,vol.4 No interval… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we proceed like this, seeking exercises of language (here we use the word "linguageiro" in Portuguese, referring to language as a social practice, aligning it to a minor, less pretentious philosophy, as wanted not only by Rorty, but also by an entire post-modern tradition with which he is curiously aligned), in semiological, ironist games, we can move towards a non-representational perspective, as far Rorty's Redescription and the Pedagogical Context as possible. Abandoning the Kantian transcendental canons, we would find some exits, for example, in a historicism with Hegelian inspiration (Toledo Jr, 2007). Let us seek exits then... in free conversation, breaking intersubjective simulacra, once, from now on, the way we speak is more important than keeping axioms.…”
Section: Was Rorty a Pragmatist? Redescription As An Aesthetic Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we proceed like this, seeking exercises of language (here we use the word "linguageiro" in Portuguese, referring to language as a social practice, aligning it to a minor, less pretentious philosophy, as wanted not only by Rorty, but also by an entire post-modern tradition with which he is curiously aligned), in semiological, ironist games, we can move towards a non-representational perspective, as far Rorty's Redescription and the Pedagogical Context as possible. Abandoning the Kantian transcendental canons, we would find some exits, for example, in a historicism with Hegelian inspiration (Toledo Jr, 2007). Let us seek exits then... in free conversation, breaking intersubjective simulacra, once, from now on, the way we speak is more important than keeping axioms.…”
Section: Was Rorty a Pragmatist? Redescription As An Aesthetic Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rortyan writing therefore assumes a figurative and even literary character, abandoning universalist precepts, electing metaphors to cut out pseudo-problems of traditional philosophy, such as truth, good, beauty and knowledge. Rorty joins the chroniclers, workers of writing, pointing spears against religion, science and other institutions, seeking possible connections between them, as a cultural articulator, mediating debates about representations, social values, abandoning the old essentialist searches, in order to become a practitioner of cultural policy (Toledo Jr., 2007). With respect to epistemology, the most overwhelming strike concerns, except for a mistake, the abandonment of the notion of knowledge as representation.…”
Section: Was Rorty a Pragmatist? Redescription As An Aesthetic Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%