2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-20612013005000063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detection of genetically modified maize events in Brazilian maize-derived food products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A summary of electrophoresis results is displayed in Figures 4 and 5. This observation is consistent with [35] Arun et al (2013), showed that among 14 tested samples containing maize ingredients, 8 contained Bt11 maize transgenic variety. [12] Similarly, previous study conducted in Iran proved that of all 5 non-labeled positive maize samples, 2 and 3 containing GM lines, that is CaMV35 S promoter were Bt11 and MON810, respectively.…”
Section: Quality Assurancesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A summary of electrophoresis results is displayed in Figures 4 and 5. This observation is consistent with [35] Arun et al (2013), showed that among 14 tested samples containing maize ingredients, 8 contained Bt11 maize transgenic variety. [12] Similarly, previous study conducted in Iran proved that of all 5 non-labeled positive maize samples, 2 and 3 containing GM lines, that is CaMV35 S promoter were Bt11 and MON810, respectively.…”
Section: Quality Assurancesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although requiring special reagents and equipment, PCR can detect the presence of specific exogenous genes inserted into the plant genome (including the seeds), and represents the most widely used method to detect GM food and feed (Dinon et al, 2011;Branquinho et al, 2013;Cantelmo et al, 2013). In the present study, we used real time PCR to detect three GM-specific fragments: the promoter region p-35S derived from the cauliflower mosaic virus (Waiblinger et al, 2008;Huber et al, 2013), the terminator region, t-Nos, derived from the nopaline synthase gene of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Reiting et al, 2007;Huber et al, 2013), and the main cry1A.105 gene from Bt (Dinon et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only non-labeled flour was negative for the three GM targets. A study was previously performed to verify compliance with Brazilian laws on the reporting of GM crops in food (Branquinho et al, 2013). Those authors reported the occurrence of several food products with GM organisms that were not properly labeled between 2011 and 2012.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rotulagem é um instrumento com múltiplas funções: (i) permite ao consumidor o direito de ser informado, de maneira adequada, sobre a composição do alimento que está disposto a consumir, o que possibilita escolhas e decisões informadas, (ii) atende a necessidade do consumidor que pertence a um grupo de risco de evitar consumir produtos que não deveria por prescrição médica, e (iii) garante a segurança do consumidor ao permitir o rastreamento e o controle pós-comercialização de produtos alimentícios, possibilitando o controle de qualidade destes produtos 26 e pesquisas sobre os impactos na saúde. No entanto, muitos alimentos contendo ingredientes derivados de variedades transgênicas não têm sua composição claramente identificada no rótulo [27][28][29][30] .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified