2003
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-20612003000400009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of methods by TLC and HPTLC for determination of aflatoxin M1 in milk and B1 in eggs

Abstract: Comparação de metodologias para análise de aflatoxinas M 1 e B 1 em leite e ovos, Scussel 1. Recebido para publicação em 07/08/2001. Aceito para publicação em 11/09/2003 (000711). 2 Laboratory of Mycotoxicology, Food Science and Technology Department, Centre of Agricultural Sciences, Federal University of Santa Catarina, POBox 476, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. Fax +55 (0) 48.331.9943, e-mail: vildes@cca.ufsc -INTRODUCTIONAflatoxin M 1 (AFM 1 ), a metabolite of aflatoxin B 1 (AFB 1 ), was first detected in mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2D-TLC analyses, the plate is turned 180 • after the first development and aflatoxins and matrix components are further separated in the 2nd development. The comparison of 1D-TLC and 2D-TLC for aflatoxin M 1 and B 1 in fatty foods (milk and eggs) shows that the two techniques provide comparable recoveries, but RSDs associated with 2D-TLC are much lower (7%) than that of 1D-TLC (16%), suggesting better repeatability [176]. The author emphasized that with limited separation capacity, 2D-TLC-based determinations of aflatoxin M 1 and B 1 requires in-depth sample clean-up procedures for fatty samples but the TLC analysis itself is an easy operation for inexperienced chemists and a more economical choice for labs without a budget for capital instruments such as LC.…”
Section: Thin Layer Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2D-TLC analyses, the plate is turned 180 • after the first development and aflatoxins and matrix components are further separated in the 2nd development. The comparison of 1D-TLC and 2D-TLC for aflatoxin M 1 and B 1 in fatty foods (milk and eggs) shows that the two techniques provide comparable recoveries, but RSDs associated with 2D-TLC are much lower (7%) than that of 1D-TLC (16%), suggesting better repeatability [176]. The author emphasized that with limited separation capacity, 2D-TLC-based determinations of aflatoxin M 1 and B 1 requires in-depth sample clean-up procedures for fatty samples but the TLC analysis itself is an easy operation for inexperienced chemists and a more economical choice for labs without a budget for capital instruments such as LC.…”
Section: Thin Layer Chromatographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A ocorrência de micotoxinas em milho e produtos a base de milho tem sido reportada por vários autores, principalmente em se tratando de aflatoxina e fumonisina (Amaral et al, 2006;Kawashima & Valente soares, 2006;Sekiyama et al, 2005;Camargos et al, 2000, Fick et al, 2003, Machinski et al, 2001, Caldas & Silva, 2007.…”
Section: Grãos Cereais E Derivadosunclassified
“…Some of the existing methods used for AFB 1 quantification include thin layer chromatography (TLC); high performance thin layer chromatography (Scussel, 2003); high performance liquid chromatography (Gilbert, 1999;Trucksess & Pohland, 2001); immunochemical methods like ELISA (Chu, 2004); flow system coupled capillary electrophoresis (Pena et al, 2002); immunochromatographic strip (Xiulan et al, 2006). Although high performance liquid chromatography methods (HPLC) and immunoassays (ELISA) have high selectivity and are accurate offering good detection limits (0.01-0.1 ppb); it is time consuming, requiring the use of unfriendly chemicals and trained laboratory personnel (Huie, 2002;Laasonen, Harmia-Pulkkinen, Simard, Räsänen, & Vuorela, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%