2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x2005000700017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of sweat rate during graded exercise and the local rate induced by pilocarpine

Abstract: Centrally stimulated sweat rate produced by graded exercise until exhaustion was compared to the local sweat rate induced by pilocarpine, often used as a sweating index for healthy individuals. Nine young male volunteers (22 ± 4 years) were studied in temperate environment in two situations: at rest and during progressive exercise with 25 W increases every 2 min until exhaustion, on a cycle ergometer. In both situations, sweating was induced on the right forearm with 5 ml 0.5% pilocarpine hydrochloride applied… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Pilocarpine iontophoresis is the gold-standard sweat-testing method for diagnosing cystic fibrosis (CF) [101]; however, it is important to note that the sweating response differs significantly between pharmacological and thermal and/or exercise-induced sweating. Most notably, LSR is consistently higher with exercise and thermal stress compared with pilocarpine iontophoresis [19, 102, 103]. The reason for the discrepancy could be related to the different mechanisms involved in the sudomotor response between methods.…”
Section: Methodological Sources Of Variability In Sweating Rate and Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pilocarpine iontophoresis is the gold-standard sweat-testing method for diagnosing cystic fibrosis (CF) [101]; however, it is important to note that the sweating response differs significantly between pharmacological and thermal and/or exercise-induced sweating. Most notably, LSR is consistently higher with exercise and thermal stress compared with pilocarpine iontophoresis [19, 102, 103]. The reason for the discrepancy could be related to the different mechanisms involved in the sudomotor response between methods.…”
Section: Methodological Sources Of Variability In Sweating Rate and Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Um estudo anterior em nosso laboratório mostrou que a medida das taxas de sudorese global e no antebraço, durante o exercício progressivo até a exaustão (GXT), constitui indicador objetivo da capacidade sudorípara de um grupo de indivíduos normais como resultado da ativação do sistema nervoso simpático por estímulo térmico e não térmico (16) . No entanto, até o momento, a taxa de sudorese de diabéticos não foi medida durante o GXT, para avaliar se ela poderia ou não ser utilizada como índice da integridade da função simpática periférica.…”
Section: Artigo Originalunclassified
“…A produção de sudorese local foi medida utilizando uma câmara criada por plástico (64cm²) fixado na região anterior do terço médio do antebraço direito (AD) utilizando-se esparadrapo, onde um papel-filtro absorvente (16cm 2 ) (J Prolab, SJ, dos Pinhais, PR, Brasil), anteriormente pesado, foi colocado através de uma abertura em uma das extremidades dessa câmara, que foi vedada em seguida (16) . Assim que o voluntário atingia a FC de 150bpm, o papel-filtro era substituído por outro, que seria retirado no período de recuperação do exercício.…”
Section: Métodosunclassified
“…Kahn and Rothman (1942) were the first to observe sexrelated differences in sweat response pharmacologically induced by intradermal injections of acetylcholine. Currently, pilocarpine iontophoresis has been successfully used as a standard, non-invasive procedure to locally induce sweating (Buono et al 1992;Hjortskov et al 1995;Vimieiro-Gomes et al 2005) since this cholinergic agonist binds directly to muscarinic receptors on the gland, and its action occurs independently of changes in sympathetic drive. Thus, differences in sweat response elicited by this method will only reflect differences in eccrine sweat glands per se, specifically in the maximal response to pilocarpine and/or in cholinergic sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%