2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-1262-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex-related differences in sweat gland cholinergic sensitivity exist irrespective of differences in aerobic capacity

Abstract: Mechanisms accounting for sex-related differences in the sweat response remain to be elucidated. In the present study, we focused on differences in sweat gland cholinergic sensitivity between males and females. Since, males usually possess higher aerobic capacity than females, we investigated sweating in males and females grouped according to aerobic capacity (.VO(2peak)). Forty-four subjects were assigned to four groups: males with higher (MH) and lower (ML), and females with higher (FH) and lower (FL) .VO(2p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
30
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Buono and Sjoholm (2) observed a similar sweat rate to a given dose of pilocarpine between sexes with similar training status, albeit it was achieved through a greater sweat output in males, relative to greater sweat gland recruitment in females. Most recently, Madeira et al (21) reported that the extrapolated maximal sweat response to pilocarpine does not differ between males and females matched for maximum oxygen consumption, even though females demonstrate a lower cholinergic sensitivity of the sweat gland. Although these studies generally support peripheral differences in the properties of the sweat gland in females, the mechanisms by which sex differences in sudomotor activity occur for a given dose of cholinergic agonist have not been evaluated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In contrast, Buono and Sjoholm (2) observed a similar sweat rate to a given dose of pilocarpine between sexes with similar training status, albeit it was achieved through a greater sweat output in males, relative to greater sweat gland recruitment in females. Most recently, Madeira et al (21) reported that the extrapolated maximal sweat response to pilocarpine does not differ between males and females matched for maximum oxygen consumption, even though females demonstrate a lower cholinergic sensitivity of the sweat gland. Although these studies generally support peripheral differences in the properties of the sweat gland in females, the mechanisms by which sex differences in sudomotor activity occur for a given dose of cholinergic agonist have not been evaluated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a previous study applying the present method, healthy volunteers showed 20% reduced sweating response related to 20% reduced aerobic capacity 9 . Therefore, it seems unlikely that the 10% lower VO 2max previously reported in NF1 could exclusively explain the 35% to 65% reductions in NF1 SR observed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…To prevent individual variations in local skin temperature, the forearm was heated for 15 minutes prior to pharmacological stimulation and its temperature was maintained (~35° C) throughout the experiment, using radiant heat from an adjustable infrared emission lamp (Quartz®, Brazil). It has been shown previously that these procedures induce maximal sweating to pilocarpine, irrespective of sex and aerobic capacity 9 . Sweat secretion was collected for 15 minutes just after stimulation using a 16 cm 2 absorbent paper (J Prolab, Brazil) placed inside a plastic chamber to prevent sweat evaporation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 Both the groin and axilla are rich in sweat glands and this may explain why these sites are most frequently colonized, and why males, with more active sweat glands, are more commonly colonized. 9 The finding that colonization was higher for patients on antibiotics may relate to the effect of antibiotics on the skin microbiome. Alterations (loss) to the skin microbiome may reduce the resistance to colonization normally provided by commensal bacteria, so called colonization resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%