2018
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-83582017350100088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Destructive Model to Predict Commelina diffusa Leaf Area

Abstract: -Leaf length (L), leaf width (W), and leaf area (LA) were measured from 100 leaves aiming to determine a simple linear equation (Y=a*X) to predict the leaf area of Commelina diffusa, an important weed infesting annual and perennial crops in Brazil and worldwide. Results indicate the equation LA=0.7*LW reliably estimates the leaf area of C. diffusa, after correlating LA with LW, and then validating that equation by analyzing four new 25-leaf samples.Keywords: plant growth, biometry, non-destructive method, math… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The determination coefficients (R²) were greater than 0.84, indicating that at least 84% variation in leaf area of E. pauferrense can be explained by the proposed equations. Also, the equations adjusted using the product of length by width (L.W) met the assumptions for estimating leaf area, thus best fitting the regression models (Carvalho et al, 2017b;Pezzini et al, 2018;Guimarães et al, 2019;Oliveira et al, 2019b), except for the exponential model, where best indexes were obtained using the product of length by length (L.L).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The determination coefficients (R²) were greater than 0.84, indicating that at least 84% variation in leaf area of E. pauferrense can be explained by the proposed equations. Also, the equations adjusted using the product of length by width (L.W) met the assumptions for estimating leaf area, thus best fitting the regression models (Carvalho et al, 2017b;Pezzini et al, 2018;Guimarães et al, 2019;Oliveira et al, 2019b), except for the exponential model, where best indexes were obtained using the product of length by length (L.L).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%