2015
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-83582015000100006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levels of nutrients and grain yield of maize intercropped with signalgrass (Brachiaria) in different arrangements of plants

Abstract: -Competition between maize and signalgrass can economically cripple the intercropping by the reduced yield of maize and dry matter content of the forage. In seeking to define plant arrangements which make this system more efficient, this research was held with the objective of assessing the effects of interference of densities of signalgrass (Urochloa Brizantha) on nutrition and on maize grain yield. Two field experiments were conducted in a randomized block design with four replications. Treatments were arran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that modifying the spatial arrangement of plants, even in intercropping, can increase maize yield. Some authors found that, in many cases, there can be no significant difference between the yield of the alone maize cropping and intercropped with forages, which depends on the combination of several factors, including the perennial forage population, the time of its implementation and planting arrangements (Jakelaitis et al, 2006;Resende et al, 2008;Freitas et al, 2015). Over the years, the adoption of the consortium results in higher amount of straw, increases soil organic matter, and both off-season and the summer crop cultivation productivity tend to rise.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show that modifying the spatial arrangement of plants, even in intercropping, can increase maize yield. Some authors found that, in many cases, there can be no significant difference between the yield of the alone maize cropping and intercropped with forages, which depends on the combination of several factors, including the perennial forage population, the time of its implementation and planting arrangements (Jakelaitis et al, 2006;Resende et al, 2008;Freitas et al, 2015). Over the years, the adoption of the consortium results in higher amount of straw, increases soil organic matter, and both off-season and the summer crop cultivation productivity tend to rise.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nicosulfuron is classified as being low to moderately persistent in soil, with maximum residual levels between 0.01 and 0.02 [12]. Despite its low persistence, its residues have been reported in many matrices, such as soil [13,14], surface water [15,16], and some crops [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ha -1 (T4), and standard treatment of 8 g. a.i. ha -1 of the nicosulfuron herbicide (T5), according to Ferreira et al (2007) and Freitas et al (2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration of corn and forage of the Urochloa genus is one of the best intercropping options due to the high metabolic efficiency of the species involved and the excellent adaptation of the forages to the Midwest region soils and climate, using basically the forages Urochloa brizantha and Urochloa decumbens, and the nicosulfuron herbicide is widely used as a standard tool for forage suppression (Ferreira et al, 2007;Cavalieri et al, 2008;Silva et al, 2014;Freitas et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%